{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD","short_pith_number":"pith:WX3JNTJQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b5f696cd30ba5dd3613ee72d32ed5ca8dadf958e5ea31897f0315adb24ef702b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1612.06967","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Note on information bias and efficiency of composite likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Libai Xu, Nancy Reid, Ximing Xu","submitted_at":"2016-12-21T04:16:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Does the asymptotic variance of the maximum composite likelihood estimator of a parameter of interest always decrease when the nuisance parameters are known? Will a composite likelihood necessarily become more efficient by incorporating addi- tional independent component likelihoods, or by using component likelihoods with higher dimension? In this note we show through illustrative examples that the an- swer to both questions is no, and indeed the opposite direction might be observed. The role of information bias is highlighted to understand the occurrence of these paradoxical phenomenon."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1612.06967","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2016-12-21T04:16:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"9407bb88e0bed15c8e62489e7688584d8140e0c61c478b3e6f70bd7b4c6fdebf","abstract_canon_sha256":"7b503716b0511bec96d9a732a7d3a42f40b912dab64d1f33353cea7b5bfd804d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977451Z","signature_b64":"hw5EySNHFKb7Qowa2igN+8XPf8u3qLnmirCeP72h9b6ai7wVXQfIsvy0ZEgKPbaJqBxSteaW9SyBObAlEEDKAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b5f696cd30ba5dd3613ee72d32ed5ca8dadf958e5ea31897f0315adb24ef702b","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.976948Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.976948Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Note on information bias and efficiency of composite likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Libai Xu, Nancy Reid, Ximing Xu","submitted_at":"2016-12-21T04:16:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Does the asymptotic variance of the maximum composite likelihood estimator of a parameter of interest always decrease when the nuisance parameters are known? Will a composite likelihood necessarily become more efficient by incorporating addi- tional independent component likelihoods, or by using component likelihoods with higher dimension? In this note we show through illustrative examples that the an- swer to both questions is no, and indeed the opposite direction might be observed. The role of information bias is highlighted to understand the occurrence of these paradoxical phenomenon."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1612.06967","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1612.06967","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1612.06967v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1612.06967","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WX3JNTJQXJO5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WX3JNTJQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.14390","citing_title":"Composite likelihood inference for the Poisson log-normal model","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WX3JNTJQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WX3JNTJQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1612.06967&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WX3JNTJQXJO5GYJ644WTF3K4VD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977031+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:54:14.977031+00:00"}