{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI","short_pith_number":"pith:WY5TOA2Z","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b63b3703590f02ad9b9efb045a69610a15cda14d2786dab2a0e4be1b1d2eb432","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.16604","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Shared Imagination: LLMs Hallucinate Alike","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Caiming Xiong, Chien-Sheng Wu, Silvio Savarese, Yilun Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:06:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the recent proliferation of large language models (LLMs), their training recipes -- model architecture, pre-training data and optimization algorithm -- are often very similar. This naturally raises the question of the similarity among the resulting models. In this paper, we propose a novel setting, imaginary question answering (IQA), to better understand model similarity. In IQA, we ask one model to generate purely imaginary questions (e.g., on completely made-up concepts in physics) and prompt another model to answer. Surprisingly, despite the total fictionality of these questions, al"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.16604","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:06:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"224a39784a880dbb1f1b4ec8fa45e2c1734294faf3190f55dff727e84359f8ae","abstract_canon_sha256":"29819124cf40a553e9447421a941a3a77b002810646519bab79bf408883b4541"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744603Z","signature_b64":"XkleBsfksf/bRVzeNpckjRIcZ/AbtXZ7HwjelNuTmR41bTlOZhtJCEPGHaASQbI5/WFbpwvOj4dA9A5JEA1wBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b63b3703590f02ad9b9efb045a69610a15cda14d2786dab2a0e4be1b1d2eb432","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744115Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744115Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Shared Imagination: LLMs Hallucinate Alike","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Caiming Xiong, Chien-Sheng Wu, Silvio Savarese, Yilun Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-07-23T16:06:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the recent proliferation of large language models (LLMs), their training recipes -- model architecture, pre-training data and optimization algorithm -- are often very similar. This naturally raises the question of the similarity among the resulting models. In this paper, we propose a novel setting, imaginary question answering (IQA), to better understand model similarity. In IQA, we ask one model to generate purely imaginary questions (e.g., on completely made-up concepts in physics) and prompt another model to answer. Surprisingly, despite the total fictionality of these questions, al"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.16604","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.16604/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.16604","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.16604v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.16604","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WY5TOA2ZB4BK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G46","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WY5TOA2Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11258","citing_title":"Unlocking LLM Creativity in Science through Analogical Reasoning","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WY5TOA2Z"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WY5TOA2Z","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.16604&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WY5TOA2ZB4BK3G467MCFU2LBBI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:47:35.744164+00:00"}