{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK","short_pith_number":"pith:WZSGAO4H","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b664603b87211e4f45fb93b9326edb82a9999ea9616a512cc576f0846ea9f6ed","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.20762","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Co-Construction Blindness and Asymmetric Epistemic Vulnerability in Human-LLM Interaction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Bianca Helena Ximenes","submitted_at":"2026-06-18T10:00:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces two constructs to describe, as far as we know, a previously unnamed risk in human-LLM interaction. Co-construction blindness is the failure to recognize that LLM outputs are not independent assessments to be verified, but co-constructed artifacts shaped by the user's own inputs, accumulated history, and metadata. Every user of a conversational LLM is IN the loop, not ON it -- yet every deployment disclaimer positions them as external auditors. Asymmetric epistemic vulnerability describes the condition in which co-construction blindness produces consequences of radically d"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.20762","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-06-18T10:00:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"fef5215b03209dbcb192c8d2a15337476acb6c58ca23557d54b465f87af2e663","abstract_canon_sha256":"689f2c7e9843f43af541017a7302389a189bff591e5d79b1e157da7c8f7a954d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055499Z","signature_b64":"9SzYryDK8v397yUQY7cSh5KFj4H1FgIQbDPh+5z5XTIEjUTDrIVPJnu36G67NbPA7u7u4ipUWlkwJO1ukB81Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b664603b87211e4f45fb93b9326edb82a9999ea9616a512cc576f0846ea9f6ed","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055119Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055119Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Co-Construction Blindness and Asymmetric Epistemic Vulnerability in Human-LLM Interaction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Bianca Helena Ximenes","submitted_at":"2026-06-18T10:00:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces two constructs to describe, as far as we know, a previously unnamed risk in human-LLM interaction. Co-construction blindness is the failure to recognize that LLM outputs are not independent assessments to be verified, but co-constructed artifacts shaped by the user's own inputs, accumulated history, and metadata. Every user of a conversational LLM is IN the loop, not ON it -- yet every deployment disclaimer positions them as external auditors. Asymmetric epistemic vulnerability describes the condition in which co-construction blindness produces consequences of radically d"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.20762","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.20762/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.20762","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.20762v1","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.20762","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WZSGAO4HEEPE","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WZSGAO4H","created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WZSGAO4H"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WZSGAO4H","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.20762&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WZSGAO4HEEPE6RP3SO4TE3W3QK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-23T00:11:56.055181+00:00"}