{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R","short_pith_number":"pith:WZUJTSWM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b66899caccaad08abe7f085f230e3efc79759ec0d4b929f9d784e37e394863b7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.27554","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"What Catches the Eye? A Conjoint Study of Infographic Design Preferences","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Amit Kumar Das, Karanbir Pelia, Klaus Mueller, Manav Nitesh Ukani","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T18:23:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Infographic designers balance many choices at once: chart type, color, and whether to add a benchmark or a scale. Past work studies these factors one at a time, so we know little about how readers weigh them against each other. We address this gap with a choice-based conjoint study (N = 65) in which participants viewed pairs of infographics on a mock newspaper page about unemployment. Each infographic varied across three attributes: comparison type (none, US average, percentage scale), color (red, blue), and graphic type (single icon, icon series, bar chart). Comparison type drove most of the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.27554","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T18:23:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b3a9baffa5c18aababdc0e807911f205e7d1effa45f2b634c03bc90c21968085","abstract_canon_sha256":"0195a2ca623edb61c270ae600c3665bf9eca6e8bc9062ae932da18e9f7faacb6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637800Z","signature_b64":"NhAKaPK15LaeBoZ5ffsqNBrpFPKr0T8fBlqaP8mNdFCaCzfR9lEwfSesyGjjlnqIOiWqEd1tK8uT/5/m6IYJBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b66899caccaad08abe7f085f230e3efc79759ec0d4b929f9d784e37e394863b7","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637229Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637229Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"What Catches the Eye? A Conjoint Study of Infographic Design Preferences","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Amit Kumar Das, Karanbir Pelia, Klaus Mueller, Manav Nitesh Ukani","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T18:23:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Infographic designers balance many choices at once: chart type, color, and whether to add a benchmark or a scale. Past work studies these factors one at a time, so we know little about how readers weigh them against each other. We address this gap with a choice-based conjoint study (N = 65) in which participants viewed pairs of infographics on a mock newspaper page about unemployment. Each infographic varied across three attributes: comparison type (none, US average, percentage scale), color (red, blue), and graphic type (single icon, icon series, bar chart). Comparison type drove most of the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.27554","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.27554/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.27554","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.27554v1","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.27554","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WZUJTSWMVLII","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WZUJTSWM","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WZUJTSWM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WZUJTSWM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.27554&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WZUJTSWMVLIIVPT7BBPSGDR67R/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:15.637367+00:00"}