{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI","short_pith_number":"pith:X2BPJAO4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"be82f481dc5d44330dbcb0676feec15230a63fcd507fd158407b59524aa9210b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2011.03127","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causal Imputation via Synthetic Interventions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anish Agarwal, Caroline Uhler, Chandler Squires, Dennis Shen, Devavrat Shah","submitted_at":"2020-11-05T22:39:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consider the problem of determining the effect of a compound on a specific cell type. To answer this question, researchers traditionally need to run an experiment applying the drug of interest to that cell type. This approach is not scalable: given a large number of different actions (compounds) and a large number of different contexts (cell types), it is infeasible to run an experiment for every action-context pair. In such cases, one would ideally like to predict the outcome for every pair while only having to perform experiments on a small subset of pairs. This task, which we label \"causal "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2011.03127","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2020-11-05T22:39:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"13f19ad36260ef0900db912a92e7bbb9dc517064dcce58e7cf5d8a5c55bec20e","abstract_canon_sha256":"3c93827eb98d711cfbd9905f8592e9f0e248124b053ed838ea1ecb7dc24c21ee"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.891001Z","signature_b64":"H0dqs6/QfFSteCsr3sjWo/jncAGxSEsKV9RfNhMLlcQicu1dP856jwtK4UBDsgQWaMGKWwzFInQ90v4ZQ/CxBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"be82f481dc5d44330dbcb0676feec15230a63fcd507fd158407b59524aa9210b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890603Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890603Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causal Imputation via Synthetic Interventions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anish Agarwal, Caroline Uhler, Chandler Squires, Dennis Shen, Devavrat Shah","submitted_at":"2020-11-05T22:39:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consider the problem of determining the effect of a compound on a specific cell type. To answer this question, researchers traditionally need to run an experiment applying the drug of interest to that cell type. This approach is not scalable: given a large number of different actions (compounds) and a large number of different contexts (cell types), it is infeasible to run an experiment for every action-context pair. In such cases, one would ideally like to predict the outcome for every pair while only having to perform experiments on a small subset of pairs. This task, which we label \"causal "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2011.03127","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2011.03127/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2011.03127","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2011.03127v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.03127","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"X2BPJAO4LVCD","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"X2BPJAO4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21840","citing_title":"A Test for Treatment Heterogeneity under a Distributional Difference-in-Difference Framework","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X2BPJAO4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X2BPJAO4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2011.03127&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/X2BPJAO4LVCDGDN4WBTW73WBKI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:19:32.890659+00:00"}