{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK","short_pith_number":"pith:X57KVVGV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bf7eaad4d53fcd03bacc8bc7da9f8f7289b1f7473605f5e442fc1e35b67207c6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.15249","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are we there yet?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abhay Puri, Christopher Pal, Gaurav Sahu, Issam H. Laradji, Jason Stanley, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Laurent Charlin, Shubham Agarwal","submitted_at":"2024-12-15T01:12:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Literature reviews are an essential component of scientific research, but they remain time-intensive and challenging to write, especially due to the recent influx of research papers. This paper explores the zero-shot abilities of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) in assisting with the writing of literature reviews based on an abstract. We decompose the task into two components: 1. Retrieving related works given a query abstract, and 2. Writing a literature review based on the retrieved results. We analyze how effective LLMs are for both components. For retrieval, we introduce a novel two-ste"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.15249","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-12-15T01:12:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"0d98b1ab9b0203c97de7fd3b4da4232f2831d6489c25271c1f9a0672a7aeadec","abstract_canon_sha256":"908d877f1ef76fa438bea8cbf6fa74b644a9f0b1281f6c144a903ec6956a5004"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390857Z","signature_b64":"ISFz/a13NJqq2Ja7U1+DIAeyMPllnxFscktClXxZJhYTuvt978Bgn6fJnGR6qa7PjxygNbGwP6HaeZwvpXzXCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bf7eaad4d53fcd03bacc8bc7da9f8f7289b1f7473605f5e442fc1e35b67207c6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.389906Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.389906Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are we there yet?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abhay Puri, Christopher Pal, Gaurav Sahu, Issam H. Laradji, Jason Stanley, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Laurent Charlin, Shubham Agarwal","submitted_at":"2024-12-15T01:12:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Literature reviews are an essential component of scientific research, but they remain time-intensive and challenging to write, especially due to the recent influx of research papers. This paper explores the zero-shot abilities of recent Large Language Models (LLMs) in assisting with the writing of literature reviews based on an abstract. We decompose the task into two components: 1. Retrieving related works given a query abstract, and 2. Writing a literature review based on the retrieved results. We analyze how effective LLMs are for both components. For retrieval, we introduce a novel two-ste"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.15249","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.15249/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.15249","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.15249v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.15249","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"X57KVVGVH7GQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"X57KVVGVH7GQHOWM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"X57KVVGV","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12736","citing_title":"Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05436","citing_title":"Ten Headache Specialists versus Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Literature Summarization: A Critical Evaluation and Comparison","ref_index":138,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07570","citing_title":"Can LLMs extract scientific consensus? A case study in high-temperature superconductivity","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X57KVVGV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X57KVVGV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.15249&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/X57KVVGVH7GQHOWMRPD5VH4POK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:36:33.390016+00:00"}