{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R","short_pith_number":"pith:X5YQUPZO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bf710a3f2e371fd3dcb450a4c983e6dc407ff9380c05e544c8362402011a2e1e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.01897","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Andrea Antonelli, Jonathan R. Gair, Ollie Burke","submitted_at":"2021-04-02T08:15:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding and dealing with inference biases in gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation when a plethora of signals are present in the data is one of the key challenges for the analysis of data from future GW detectors. Working within the linear signal approximation, we describe generic metrics to predict inference biases on GW source parameters in the presence of confusion noise from unfitted foregrounds, from overlapping signals that coalesce close in time to one another, and from residuals of other signals that have been incorrectly fitted out. We illustrate the formalism with simpli"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.01897","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2021-04-02T08:15:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"980e188264523f909fd319690b7e610da9316d8123266c63fb9f7306bc8edb3a","abstract_canon_sha256":"0316c7863825bcef1f294f68f3572ff43b10065aa54b98c5dbfe0463a075b485"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.578135Z","signature_b64":"3xEhdNAQvi1Ojw3QulFr1mho/WH9u+gRFB//70VBwEicGA9IBGKQLrmtGY4OuYFnHlKMWiSnWjONBZSgpXSYDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bf710a3f2e371fd3dcb450a4c983e6dc407ff9380c05e544c8362402011a2e1e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577707Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577707Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Andrea Antonelli, Jonathan R. Gair, Ollie Burke","submitted_at":"2021-04-02T08:15:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding and dealing with inference biases in gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation when a plethora of signals are present in the data is one of the key challenges for the analysis of data from future GW detectors. Working within the linear signal approximation, we describe generic metrics to predict inference biases on GW source parameters in the presence of confusion noise from unfitted foregrounds, from overlapping signals that coalesce close in time to one another, and from residuals of other signals that have been incorrectly fitted out. We illustrate the formalism with simpli"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.01897","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.01897/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.01897","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.01897v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.01897","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"X5YQUPZOG4P5","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFU","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"X5YQUPZO","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.14924","citing_title":"Residual Test for the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R","json":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X5YQUPZO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X5YQUPZO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.01897&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/X5YQUPZOG4P5HXFUKCSMTA7G3R/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:27.577765+00:00"}