{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1992:X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7","short_pith_number":"pith:X6WASWMD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bfac09598322f6b8c3e9053bcbc4dc0fc96b25b853bce3a763a40c5961551ed8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-ph/9203208","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Monopole annihilation at the electroweak scale---Not!","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"E. Gates L. Krauss J. Terning","submitted_at":"1992-03-10T16:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the issue of monopole annihilation at the electroweak scale induced by flux tube confinement, concentrating first on the simplest possibility---one which requires no new physics beyond the standard model. Monopoles existing at the time of the electroweak phase transition may trigger $W$ condensation which can confine magnetic flux into flux tubes. However we show on very general grounds, using several independent estimates, that such a mechanism is impotent. We then present several general dynamical arguments constraining the possibility of monopole annihilation through any confinin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9203208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"1992-03-10T16:00:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"95dc76cb77465937b5ea293cd9fabc367a0a485f2b67db536b72d06b5aae0d46","abstract_canon_sha256":"8a31b3c0b3f663b23c2e9c5336b8341c612500221d0598ab2ea4c7c6a6ae2e22"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705774Z","signature_b64":"uV8/WadZm0Hqk8RezPjYzq5YlWJIpaSCBi6Djf4erftsC1i7Pppzre7NWsAbRymyTcp4RXeEa/R3OpxVDgIABw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bfac09598322f6b8c3e9053bcbc4dc0fc96b25b853bce3a763a40c5961551ed8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705358Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705358Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Monopole annihilation at the electroweak scale---Not!","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"E. Gates L. Krauss J. Terning","submitted_at":"1992-03-10T16:00:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the issue of monopole annihilation at the electroweak scale induced by flux tube confinement, concentrating first on the simplest possibility---one which requires no new physics beyond the standard model. Monopoles existing at the time of the electroweak phase transition may trigger $W$ condensation which can confine magnetic flux into flux tubes. However we show on very general grounds, using several independent estimates, that such a mechanism is impotent. We then present several general dynamical arguments constraining the possibility of monopole annihilation through any confinin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-ph/9203208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-ph/9203208/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-ph/9203208","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-ph/9203208v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9203208","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"X6WASWMDEL3L","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7J","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"X6WASWMD","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12874","citing_title":"A simple solution to the monopole problem: SU(5) GUT with symmetry breaking into special subgroup","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X6WASWMD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/X6WASWMD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-ph/9203208&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/X6WASWMDEL3LRQ7JAU54XRG4B7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:54:54.705422+00:00"}