{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5","short_pith_number":"pith:XAR7EZRY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b823f266388d9821d453652fbc11649f5d1d70e854899851e4e4de37432ad95d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.20902","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Preemptive Answer \"Attacks\" on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Rongwu Xu, Wei Xu, Zehan Qi","submitted_at":"2024-05-31T15:15:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) showcase impressive reasoning capabilities when coupled with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. However, the robustness of this approach warrants further investigation. In this paper, we introduce a novel scenario termed preemptive answers, where the LLM obtains an answer before engaging in reasoning. This situation can arise inadvertently or induced by malicious users by prompt injection attacks. Experiments reveal that preemptive answers significantly impair the model's reasoning capability across various CoT methods and a broad spectrum of datasets. To bolster th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.20902","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-05-31T15:15:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"467e360dac45cae465ed0a48fb18395ed24a723a0e0b51ff95672acd82b04a81","abstract_canon_sha256":"9b9024c6a13278e250a11d18a258cd0fcb6ef07848630659da45b41d0d30fd74"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597922Z","signature_b64":"HjdrETCide8ueZYsPGYAAvjTGZKiw8d4e5j6rlza0hiey+GiYJha4VapdkGFYnxmMigY0M7CoLPeh7KhqSeCCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b823f266388d9821d453652fbc11649f5d1d70e854899851e4e4de37432ad95d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597545Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597545Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Preemptive Answer \"Attacks\" on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Rongwu Xu, Wei Xu, Zehan Qi","submitted_at":"2024-05-31T15:15:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) showcase impressive reasoning capabilities when coupled with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. However, the robustness of this approach warrants further investigation. In this paper, we introduce a novel scenario termed preemptive answers, where the LLM obtains an answer before engaging in reasoning. This situation can arise inadvertently or induced by malicious users by prompt injection attacks. Experiments reveal that preemptive answers significantly impair the model's reasoning capability across various CoT methods and a broad spectrum of datasets. To bolster th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.20902","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.20902/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.20902","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.20902v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.20902","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XAR7EZRYRWMC","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCT","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XAR7EZRY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.08592","citing_title":"Less Diverse, Less Safe: The Indirect But Pervasive Risk of Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.25412","citing_title":"Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XAR7EZRY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XAR7EZRY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.20902&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XAR7EZRYRWMCDVCTMUX3YELET5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:43.597600+00:00"}