{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S","short_pith_number":"pith:XBAB5773","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b8401efffbf62a3f43e1df915ff744eca4482496eeaa3ab734637c46fe297eb2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.18717","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can AI Detect Wash Trading? Evidence from NFTs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR","cs.MA","q-fin.EC","q-fin.TR","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Brett Hemenway Falk, Gerry Tsoukalas, Niuniu Zhang","submitted_at":"2023-11-30T17:19:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing studies on crypto wash trading often use indirect statistical methods or leaked private data, both with inherent limitations. This paper leverages public on-chain NFT data for a more direct and granular estimation. Analyzing three major exchanges, we find that ~38% (30-40%) of trades and ~60% (25-95%) of traded value likely involve manipulation, with significant variation across exchanges. This direct evidence enables a critical reassessment of existing indirect methods, identifying roundedness-based regressions \\`a la Cong et al. (2023) as most promising, though still error-prone in "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.18717","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.GN","submitted_at":"2023-11-30T17:19:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR","cs.MA","q-fin.EC","q-fin.TR","stat.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"f8e4ea701e5cd1f5d2fbf87465f4db7a1d6e6b719a86f791b7a3e39cd907aff3","abstract_canon_sha256":"9eb6346f710fb6029e4e8917353009986de6941fb3bec36454fc1e3276b125cd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680712Z","signature_b64":"hBHluX74Mg6mwZtm6I5CvmruJnnRw9jsxORwrlL6c4QEtusqI5JRkFu8sWGtjfU5jeApZb01XB4pYJFB/Hw2DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b8401efffbf62a3f43e1df915ff744eca4482496eeaa3ab734637c46fe297eb2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680219Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680219Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can AI Detect Wash Trading? Evidence from NFTs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR","cs.MA","q-fin.EC","q-fin.TR","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"econ.GN","authors_text":"Brett Hemenway Falk, Gerry Tsoukalas, Niuniu Zhang","submitted_at":"2023-11-30T17:19:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing studies on crypto wash trading often use indirect statistical methods or leaked private data, both with inherent limitations. This paper leverages public on-chain NFT data for a more direct and granular estimation. Analyzing three major exchanges, we find that ~38% (30-40%) of trades and ~60% (25-95%) of traded value likely involve manipulation, with significant variation across exchanges. This direct evidence enables a critical reassessment of existing indirect methods, identifying roundedness-based regressions \\`a la Cong et al. (2023) as most promising, though still error-prone in "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.18717","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.18717/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.18717","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.18717v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.18717","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XBAB57736YVD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XBAB57736YVD6Q7B","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XBAB5773","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04027","citing_title":"High-Frequency Market Manipulation Detection with a Markov-modulated Hawkes process","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBAB5773"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBAB5773","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.18717&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XBAB57736YVD6Q7B36IV752E5S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:56.680270+00:00"}