{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2","short_pith_number":"pith:XBI4J4F3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b851c4f0bb55ef3e8ffbaffe1995af9ebb09a282948990cbf88ce650edda4cd8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.11770","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H0","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adam G. Riess, Alexei V. Filippenko, Anthony Carr, Caroline D. Huang, Charles Bennett, Dan Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Gagandeep S. Anand, Graeme E. Addison, Louise Breuval, Lucas M. Macri, Rachael Beaton, Richard I. Anderson, Saurabh Jha, Siyang Li, Stefano Casertano, Tianrui Wu, Wenlong Yuan, Yukei S. Murakami","submitted_at":"2024-08-21T16:47:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"JWST provides new opportunities to cross-check the HST Cepheid/SNeIa distance ladder, which yields the most precise local measure of H0. We analyze early JWST subsamples (~1/4 of the HST sample) from the SH0ES and CCHP groups, calibrated by a single anchor (N4258). We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (~1 sigma) with all 8 combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes: JWST Cepheids, TRGB, and JAGB by either group, plus HST TRGB and Miras. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in N4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ~0.0"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.11770","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-08-21T16:47:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9c2f62216243753183c65dbe50dd885bb5bf870100e08bd06ba7394207921815","abstract_canon_sha256":"e1056e3625f97489a8544053464d455d5cc837db220949e8eab9cebee3cdd921"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400686Z","signature_b64":"mn+AO6SUa5lkI3zYNVo6H1HqKH0je/LZ0gYJhkM7j79oM2ifVDu0zukQeDkKKmQRPAohssZQr0Kz/xj25RuWAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b851c4f0bb55ef3e8ffbaffe1995af9ebb09a282948990cbf88ce650edda4cd8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400188Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400188Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H0","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Adam G. Riess, Alexei V. Filippenko, Anthony Carr, Caroline D. Huang, Charles Bennett, Dan Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Gagandeep S. Anand, Graeme E. Addison, Louise Breuval, Lucas M. Macri, Rachael Beaton, Richard I. Anderson, Saurabh Jha, Siyang Li, Stefano Casertano, Tianrui Wu, Wenlong Yuan, Yukei S. Murakami","submitted_at":"2024-08-21T16:47:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"JWST provides new opportunities to cross-check the HST Cepheid/SNeIa distance ladder, which yields the most precise local measure of H0. We analyze early JWST subsamples (~1/4 of the HST sample) from the SH0ES and CCHP groups, calibrated by a single anchor (N4258). We find HST Cepheid distances agree well (~1 sigma) with all 8 combinations of methods, samples, and telescopes: JWST Cepheids, TRGB, and JAGB by either group, plus HST TRGB and Miras. The comparisons explicitly include the measurement uncertainty of each method in N4258, an oft-neglected but dominant term. Mean differences are ~0.0"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.11770","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.11770/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.11770","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.11770v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.11770","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XBI4J4F3KXXT","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XBI4J4F3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":13,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12822","citing_title":"Geometric obstruction to resolving the Hubble tension: orthogonality of scale and shape in distance measurements","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01226","citing_title":"Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation","ref_index":80,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02097","citing_title":"Redshift Duality with Pantheon+SH0ES in a Planck-anchored Flat $\\Lambda$CDM Framework: Implications for Hubble Tension and Observational Inference","ref_index":79,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26116","citing_title":"Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31324","citing_title":"Cosmological Viability of Exponential Infrared $f(T)$ Gravity","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02499","citing_title":"Evaluating Cepheid Metallicity Effect Determinations via IC1613 and Gaia-independent Parallaxes","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.07716","citing_title":"$\\Lambda_{\\rm s}$CDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.11769","citing_title":"The Chicago Carnegie Hubble Program: Improving the Calibration of SNe Ia with JWST Measurements of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch","ref_index":113,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.18741","citing_title":"Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum from relativistic $N$-body Simulations: $\\Lambda_{\\rm s}$CDM versus $\\Lambda$CDM","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.02526","citing_title":"Updates on dipolar anisotropy in local measurements of the Hubble constant from Cosmicflows-4","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.21445","citing_title":"Fundamental Physics in 2025: Status, Decisive Targets, and Path Forward","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.28013","citing_title":"Cosmological intercept tension","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16564","citing_title":"Observational tests of \\texorpdfstring{$\\Lambda(t)$}{Lambda(t)} cosmology in light of DESI DR2","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBI4J4F3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBI4J4F3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.11770&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XBI4J4F3KXXT5D73V77BTFNPT2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:04.400251+00:00"}