{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG","short_pith_number":"pith:XBRLOZ6H","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b862b767c7ff42d783f0f3247df8bb4195e070317f26ace386367c33a3ff83d3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.02683","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Life","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Liwei Jiang, Yejin Choi, Yu Ying Chiu","submitted_at":"2024-10-03T17:08:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"As users increasingly seek guidance from LLMs for decision-making in daily life, many of these decisions are not clear-cut and depend significantly on the personal values and ethical standards of people. We present DailyDilemmas, a dataset of 1,360 moral dilemmas encountered in everyday life. Each dilemma presents two possible actions, along with affected parties and relevant human values for each action. Based on these dilemmas, we gather a repository of human values covering diverse everyday topics, such as interpersonal relationships, workplace, and environmental issues. With DailyDilemmas,"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.02683","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-03T17:08:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"bf8e47a8f15a7708eff34f27f479d927a9308989bcca356d4af09f66318c67b0","abstract_canon_sha256":"cec0ff7d097fa0b919d3e1762e75304e7c4550e2a0397804c9a1524bfed8cfd1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.567491Z","signature_b64":"dfD5p2ODoGXYs829vySzOW1OzMOIzSyTtuL+j8K0/8tWmXInE3YmqQNilkriYXuAsPV8jD1wn8VPHJtU5cshCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b862b767c7ff42d783f0f3247df8bb4195e070317f26ace386367c33a3ff83d3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566809Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566809Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Life","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Liwei Jiang, Yejin Choi, Yu Ying Chiu","submitted_at":"2024-10-03T17:08:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"As users increasingly seek guidance from LLMs for decision-making in daily life, many of these decisions are not clear-cut and depend significantly on the personal values and ethical standards of people. We present DailyDilemmas, a dataset of 1,360 moral dilemmas encountered in everyday life. Each dilemma presents two possible actions, along with affected parties and relevant human values for each action. Based on these dilemmas, we gather a repository of human values covering diverse everyday topics, such as interpersonal relationships, workplace, and environmental issues. With DailyDilemmas,"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.02683","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.02683/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.02683","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.02683v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.02683","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XBRLOZ6H75BN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XBRLOZ6H","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02214","citing_title":"Do Gender Cues Affect LLM Value Trade-offs? Evidence from a Controlled Decision Benchmark","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31213","citing_title":"Can LLMs Imagine Moral Alternatives Beyond Binary Dilemmas?","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07539","citing_title":"Prompt Governance? On Governing Technologies Governed by Natural Language","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.20718","citing_title":"MM-MoralBench: A MultiModal Moral Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21095","citing_title":"Backchaining Loss of Control Mitigations from Mission-Specific Benchmarks in National Security","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10310","citing_title":"Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBRLOZ6H"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBRLOZ6H","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.02683&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRLOZ6H75BNPA7Q6MSH36F3IG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:47.566886+00:00"}