{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y","short_pith_number":"pith:XDEEM5CT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b8c8467453b99005deb3b8c374ee6afe2813fe451c563ab640d3dbc2d98cdbb7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.03952","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The marginal majority effect: when social influence produces lock-in","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Alexandros Gelastopoulos, Arnout Van de Rijt, Ga\\\"el Le Mens, Pantelis P. Analytis","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T20:56:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"People are influenced by the choices of others, a phenomenon observed across contexts in the social and behavioral sciences. Social influence can lock in an initial popularity advantage of an option over a higher quality alternative. Yet several experiments designed to enable social influence have found that social systems self-correct rather than lock-in. Here we identify a behavioral phenomenon that makes inferior lock-in possible, which we call the 'marginal majority effect': A discontinuous increase in the choice probability of an option as its popularity exceeds that of a competing option"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.03952","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T20:56:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.PR"],"title_canon_sha256":"6c06090e55a0224cf02ed6f0261a08cfc6b62ae8a7a1252000c2f049f9638016","abstract_canon_sha256":"5db180af52f4db1d65dfe0499a533561a2219e3e6020d28ec2c3512cd84a6d80"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.654058Z","signature_b64":"+CCV2coan69iiCykn/oOxog79D0XTBopxE252ARFzOBt56iV/HMvHpyZPyRAnSiYUoATRb34zVqvlK5sI1D4CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b8c8467453b99005deb3b8c374ee6afe2813fe451c563ab640d3dbc2d98cdbb7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653524Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653524Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The marginal majority effect: when social influence produces lock-in","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Alexandros Gelastopoulos, Arnout Van de Rijt, Ga\\\"el Le Mens, Pantelis P. Analytis","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T20:56:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"People are influenced by the choices of others, a phenomenon observed across contexts in the social and behavioral sciences. Social influence can lock in an initial popularity advantage of an option over a higher quality alternative. Yet several experiments designed to enable social influence have found that social systems self-correct rather than lock-in. Here we identify a behavioral phenomenon that makes inferior lock-in possible, which we call the 'marginal majority effect': A discontinuous increase in the choice probability of an option as its popularity exceeds that of a competing option"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.03952","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.03952/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.03952","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.03952v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.03952","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XDEEM5CTXGIA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XDEEM5CTXGIALXVT","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XDEEM5CT","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.06478","citing_title":"Elephant Random Walk with multiple extractions","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XDEEM5CT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XDEEM5CT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.03952&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XDEEM5CTXGIALXVTXDBXJ3TK7Y/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:53:25.653588+00:00"}