{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU","short_pith_number":"pith:XDW6CAAZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b8ede10019a26958e2b66294983c6e051ecea358f83c821fc040a0467a750cb5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.00578","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards an Argument Pattern for the Use of Safety Performance Indicators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Daniel Ratiu, Stefan Wagner, Tihomir Rohlinger, Torben Stolte","submitted_at":"2024-10-01T10:49:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"UL 4600, the safety standard for autonomous products, mandates the use of Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs) to continuously ensure the validity of safety cases by monitoring and taking action when violations are identified. Despite numerous examples of concrete SPIs available in the standard and companion literature, their contribution rationale for achieving safety is often left implicit. In this paper, we present our initial work towards an argument pattern for the use of SPIs to ensure validity of safety cases throughout the entire lifecycle of the system. Our aim is to make the implicit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.00578","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-10-01T10:49:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3aa5bdea0511b5174e0916f4ab5bdad390041f2bc346a68c9e159e2974512d1d","abstract_canon_sha256":"335e0bcb1b45fb3b767a86d18599231b1f3d8395751ebaa8e9b77ba029cef5c6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.356357Z","signature_b64":"1f0YyD3I58oXjFAh0UIl34dTA1v/DXYfbysA+MOVj3aHeNDX6UcSe0Q3Ax8lvXLPs8D1jBMKdZ5ebzqmEk/PBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b8ede10019a26958e2b66294983c6e051ecea358f83c821fc040a0467a750cb5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355830Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355830Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards an Argument Pattern for the Use of Safety Performance Indicators","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Daniel Ratiu, Stefan Wagner, Tihomir Rohlinger, Torben Stolte","submitted_at":"2024-10-01T10:49:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"UL 4600, the safety standard for autonomous products, mandates the use of Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs) to continuously ensure the validity of safety cases by monitoring and taking action when violations are identified. Despite numerous examples of concrete SPIs available in the standard and companion literature, their contribution rationale for achieving safety is often left implicit. In this paper, we present our initial work towards an argument pattern for the use of SPIs to ensure validity of safety cases throughout the entire lifecycle of the system. Our aim is to make the implicit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.00578","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.00578/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.00578","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.00578v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.00578","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XDW6CAAZUJUV","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XDW6CAAZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18532","citing_title":"AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Framework","ref_index":128,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XDW6CAAZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XDW6CAAZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.00578&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XDW6CAAZUJUVRYVWMKKJQPDOAU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:07.355887+00:00"}