{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2003:XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE","short_pith_number":"pith:XM2VGLM5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bb35532d9d958bbc9a0715ecd9aae5093f60909daeff9363cc4c76c3faf43d3e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0307205","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Self testing quantum apparatus","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrew Yao (Princeton), Dominic Mayers (Caltech)","submitted_at":"2003-07-28T16:42:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study a configuration of devices that includes (1) a source of some unknown bipartite quantum state that is claimed to be the Bell state $\\Phi^+$ and (2) two commuting but otherwise unknown measurement apparatus, one on each side, that are each claimed to execute an orthogonal measurement at an angle $\\theta \\in \\{0, \\pi/8, \\pi/4\\}$ that is chosen by the user. We show that, if the nine distinct probability distributions that are generated by the self checking configuration, one for each pair of angles, are consistent with the specifications, the source and the two measurement apparatus are "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0307205","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2003-07-28T16:42:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"15aa88c11dc29af54664bb3c8ae30b76ecdfc20f0e67fbda05bd1b268f682089","abstract_canon_sha256":"9bf58c7ac35791a1f8ba3db56114549520ce801d845ae468dd67d490c2f83b58"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317604Z","signature_b64":"dy+ZUScZA8f/CzT0HPJCCVNAnmHMYb8PVprpuKjSjK2rbdqohV0VyUj6BCac96Jp9E6DqHee1Gs+xZuULGPICQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bb35532d9d958bbc9a0715ecd9aae5093f60909daeff9363cc4c76c3faf43d3e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317184Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317184Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Self testing quantum apparatus","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrew Yao (Princeton), Dominic Mayers (Caltech)","submitted_at":"2003-07-28T16:42:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study a configuration of devices that includes (1) a source of some unknown bipartite quantum state that is claimed to be the Bell state $\\Phi^+$ and (2) two commuting but otherwise unknown measurement apparatus, one on each side, that are each claimed to execute an orthogonal measurement at an angle $\\theta \\in \\{0, \\pi/8, \\pi/4\\}$ that is chosen by the user. We show that, if the nine distinct probability distributions that are generated by the self checking configuration, one for each pair of angles, are consistent with the specifications, the source and the two measurement apparatus are "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0307205","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/quant-ph/0307205/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0307205","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0307205v3","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0307205","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XM2VGLM5SWF3","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQH","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XM2VGLM5","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":8,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10983","citing_title":"Robust self-testing based on Gisin's arbitrary-input Bell inequality","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21371","citing_title":"Noise robustness of three outcome Bell certified quantum randomness","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.06397","citing_title":"Self-testing of symmetric three-qubit states","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2311.07451","citing_title":"\"Nonlocality-of-a-single-photon\" based Quantum Key Distribution and Random Number Generation schemes and their device-independent security analysis","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.20350","citing_title":"Nonlocal Games in the High-Noise Regime: Optimal Quantum Values and Rigidity","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12385","citing_title":"Lower overhead fault-tolerant building blocks for noisy quantum computers","ref_index":204,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03518","citing_title":"Probing the robustness of various self-testing protocols for multipartite entangled states","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19911","citing_title":"Semi-device-independent self-testing of unitary operations","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XM2VGLM5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XM2VGLM5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0307205&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XM2VGLM5SWF3ZGQHCXWNTKXFBE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T14:46:22.317257+00:00"}