{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6","short_pith_number":"pith:XMNIQ6IC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bb1a88790228c1af14b0af422f890f3f9727a6f3de569ff21fd9c0f5b5468574","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2106.07483","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Explainable AI Explain Unfairness? A Framework for Evaluating Explainable AI","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Brianna Richardson, Emma Drobina, Juan E. Gilbert, Kiana Alikhademi","submitted_at":"2021-06-14T15:14:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many ML models are opaque to humans, producing decisions too complex for humans to easily understand. In response, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools that analyze the inner workings of a model have been created. Despite these tools' strength in translating model behavior, critiques have raised concerns about the impact of XAI tools as a tool for `fairwashing` by misleading users into trusting biased or incorrect models. In this paper, we created a framework for evaluating explainable AI tools with respect to their capabilities for detecting and addressing issues of bias and fairne"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2106.07483","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2021-06-14T15:14:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"fbe6effc5de807dd17795a1a63e5526bff3bd6a19d2cef5084058d18f6601034","abstract_canon_sha256":"461d6dcbc3e91cc2a02d23720a4fa9451e394be7c5a398c7745474f91d42aeef"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293622Z","signature_b64":"7QBRrkiw0As2TnXjVneJalmnCeZOOX9Qzhl+upMsYEgLLox5Oo6b/byaoUVgEY01imdiNVxxhLEeFyHB6TIVBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bb1a88790228c1af14b0af422f890f3f9727a6f3de569ff21fd9c0f5b5468574","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293169Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293169Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Explainable AI Explain Unfairness? A Framework for Evaluating Explainable AI","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Brianna Richardson, Emma Drobina, Juan E. Gilbert, Kiana Alikhademi","submitted_at":"2021-06-14T15:14:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many ML models are opaque to humans, producing decisions too complex for humans to easily understand. In response, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools that analyze the inner workings of a model have been created. Despite these tools' strength in translating model behavior, critiques have raised concerns about the impact of XAI tools as a tool for `fairwashing` by misleading users into trusting biased or incorrect models. In this paper, we created a framework for evaluating explainable AI tools with respect to their capabilities for detecting and addressing issues of bias and fairne"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2106.07483","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2106.07483/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2106.07483","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2106.07483v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2106.07483","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XMNIQ6ICFDA2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XMNIQ6IC","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.20437","citing_title":"On Identifying Why and When Foundation Models Perform Well on Time-Series Forecasting Using Automated Explanations and Rating","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XMNIQ6IC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XMNIQ6IC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2106.07483&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XMNIQ6ICFDA26FFQV5BC7CIPH6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:49:56.293224+00:00"}