{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF","short_pith_number":"pith:XMRGXW3Q","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bb226bdb705b26b237bf61861680923147e67f7cc9ea44946ade58f4cb8f1abb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.05364","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Classical Logic as Intuitionistic Logic with Duality","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Alexander V. Gheorghiu, Yll Buzoku","submitted_at":"2025-03-07T12:11:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"The field of proof-theoretic semantics (P-tS) offers an alternative approach to meaning in logic that is based on inference and argument (rather than truth in a model). It has been successfully developed for various logics; in particular, Sandqvist has developed such semantics for both classical and intuitionistic logic. In the case of classical logic, P-tS provides a conception of consequence that avoids an a priori commitment to the principle of bivalence, addressing what Dummett identified as a significant foundational challenge in logic. In this paper, we propose an alternative P-tS for cl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.05364","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2025-03-07T12:11:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"da036bc36cced59fb63ebe3b36c2c85b7e077b51e5cdc1b1a4e472042bb20576","abstract_canon_sha256":"b81577c128226091cd068b609b63adb5bc1358f3a8ce26915d180279b8ab9364"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.625268Z","signature_b64":"bXkCx6xn32uHA6Ue2+J/Qjb+brxDLraWgyxQ+2Evf5bwz3+YQupMGGLc/jQKd74jiKKdQ3Pdf/uZwDrAoVJnCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bb226bdb705b26b237bf61861680923147e67f7cc9ea44946ade58f4cb8f1abb","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624878Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624878Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Classical Logic as Intuitionistic Logic with Duality","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Alexander V. Gheorghiu, Yll Buzoku","submitted_at":"2025-03-07T12:11:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"The field of proof-theoretic semantics (P-tS) offers an alternative approach to meaning in logic that is based on inference and argument (rather than truth in a model). It has been successfully developed for various logics; in particular, Sandqvist has developed such semantics for both classical and intuitionistic logic. In the case of classical logic, P-tS provides a conception of consequence that avoids an a priori commitment to the principle of bivalence, addressing what Dummett identified as a significant foundational challenge in logic. In this paper, we propose an alternative P-tS for cl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.05364","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.05364/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.05364","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.05364v2","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.05364","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XMRGXW3QLMTL","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XMRGXW3Q","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05368","citing_title":"Towards an Inferentialist Account of Information Through Proof-theoretic Semantics","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XMRGXW3Q"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XMRGXW3Q","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.05364&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XMRGXW3QLMTLEN57MGDBNAESGF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:43.624937+00:00"}