{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP","short_pith_number":"pith:XN4NV3O5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bb78daeddd704401a1ee3d3104c61503fa1469429a69ee6aadf14316a20f34e4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.19881","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"EF1 Allocations for Identical Trilean and Separable Single-Peaked Valuations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Gunjan Kumar, Rakshitha, Umang Bhaskar, Yeshwant Pandit","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:47:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the fair division of items among interested agents, envy-freeness is possibly the most favoured and widely studied formalisation of fairness. For indivisible items, envy-free allocations may not exist in trivial cases, and hence research and practice focus on relaxations, particularly envy-freeness up to one item (EF1). A significant reason for the popularity of EF1 allocations is its simple fact of existence. It is known that EF1 allocations exist for two agents with arbitrary valuations; agents with doubly-monotone valuations; agents with Boolean valuations; and identical agents with nega"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.19881","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:47:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c3c799c76796df992de944c783a39835e4feb2dd26317779f0540cd2569c553b","abstract_canon_sha256":"62d579d20467be1f0776a6b014bf184f393de6283cba7f392e354ddc582f388f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.716132Z","signature_b64":"7V4kdCx+oCg/RJwKhLOMipF2QsGZF8xjObmJeBvp9+RUCYRDoacU4rFTXYai4t15AJ9qfmGufnYTIbVTWHbdAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bb78daeddd704401a1ee3d3104c61503fa1469429a69ee6aadf14316a20f34e4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715612Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715612Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"EF1 Allocations for Identical Trilean and Separable Single-Peaked Valuations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Gunjan Kumar, Rakshitha, Umang Bhaskar, Yeshwant Pandit","submitted_at":"2024-11-29T17:47:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the fair division of items among interested agents, envy-freeness is possibly the most favoured and widely studied formalisation of fairness. For indivisible items, envy-free allocations may not exist in trivial cases, and hence research and practice focus on relaxations, particularly envy-freeness up to one item (EF1). A significant reason for the popularity of EF1 allocations is its simple fact of existence. It is known that EF1 allocations exist for two agents with arbitrary valuations; agents with doubly-monotone valuations; agents with Boolean valuations; and identical agents with nega"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.19881","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.19881/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.19881","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.19881v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.19881","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XN4NV3O5OBCA","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XN4NV3O5OBCADIPO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XN4NV3O5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.04340","citing_title":"From Cake-Cutting and Necklace-Splitting to Fair Division of Indivisible Items","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XN4NV3O5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XN4NV3O5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.19881&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XN4NV3O5OBCADIPOHUYQJRQVAP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:09.715684+00:00"}