{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK","short_pith_number":"pith:XOHMCDTY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bb8ec10e78c77e774e2a825fabff146a9664f8b70e65484e1da6a1433625f8d3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1206.6224","version":6},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement's Outcome?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Avshalom C. Elitzur, Eliahu Cohen, Yakir Aharonov","submitted_at":"2012-06-27T10:11:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"An EPR experiment is studied where each particle within the entangled pair undergoes a few weak measurements (WMs) along some pre-set spin orientations, with the outcomes individually recorded. Then the particle undergoes one strong measurement along an orientation chosen at the last moment. Bell-inequality violation is expected between the two final measurements within each EPR pair. At the same time, statistical agreement is expected between these strong measurements and the earlier weak ones performed on that pair. A contradiction seemingly ensues: (i) Bell's theorem forbids spin values to "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1206.6224","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2012-06-27T10:11:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"433e4a4ec4df88a027aa32e2dd902c53e59e444da9ab823a2025226a1bd25f1d","abstract_canon_sha256":"a864c9739eb71f8f9223c1937992e1d00f47073b90a2dd8599e19e9efbb9a6cf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392849Z","signature_b64":"lHjBwHmLUf3YErRcvxW/R45InwWvb0fELzdNCUEaXwlSHgpLN/at4Amm4rTc4w5OJZCw+U9YLy0vmn2JLL4oCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bb8ec10e78c77e774e2a825fabff146a9664f8b70e65484e1da6a1433625f8d3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392235Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392235Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement's Outcome?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Avshalom C. Elitzur, Eliahu Cohen, Yakir Aharonov","submitted_at":"2012-06-27T10:11:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"An EPR experiment is studied where each particle within the entangled pair undergoes a few weak measurements (WMs) along some pre-set spin orientations, with the outcomes individually recorded. Then the particle undergoes one strong measurement along an orientation chosen at the last moment. Bell-inequality violation is expected between the two final measurements within each EPR pair. At the same time, statistical agreement is expected between these strong measurements and the earlier weak ones performed on that pair. A contradiction seemingly ensues: (i) Bell's theorem forbids spin values to "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1206.6224","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1206.6224","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1206.6224v6","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1206.6224","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XOHMCDTYY57H","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XOHMCDTYY57HOTRK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XOHMCDTY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.05990","citing_title":"Delayed choice experiments and causality in quantum mechanics","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XOHMCDTY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XOHMCDTY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1206.6224&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XOHMCDTYY57HOTRKQJP2X7YUNK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392336+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:41:58.392336+00:00"}