{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y","short_pith_number":"pith:XPYGR42E","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bbf068f344a1efcc41edcc5f21129de60e508be4fbc4e5d46fe1591d249fa6e4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.20256","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bingzhe Wu, Fanqi Wan, Jiaxiang Wu, Qifan Wang, Tao Yang, Tianyuan Shi, Xiaojun Quan","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T08:23:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable zero-shot performance across various NLP tasks. However, the potential of LLMs in personality detection, which involves identifying an individual's personality from their written texts, remains largely unexplored. Drawing inspiration from Psychological Questionnaires, which are carefully designed by psychologists to evaluate individual personality traits through a series of targeted items, we argue that these items can be regarded as a collection of well-structured chain-of-thought (CoT) processes. By i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.20256","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T08:23:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"dfc32898a0ce546510fff4efc4b64d220aeddb249bd9aba85ad3b36d2acbefe8","abstract_canon_sha256":"1cf6381791ac906eeb6409c6360bd37e2b68d4cd97b4bd5141cc48e98f6a8591"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.245401Z","signature_b64":"ChMqMotCEFRW5siOxS24P0cdsQl3X3DNuBu0KoqB3PBNnVeAu3Mdi5m7Ktq+GxezrK3ojdDFuJdNqu23NWIwCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bbf068f344a1efcc41edcc5f21129de60e508be4fbc4e5d46fe1591d249fa6e4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244922Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244922Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bingzhe Wu, Fanqi Wan, Jiaxiang Wu, Qifan Wang, Tao Yang, Tianyuan Shi, Xiaojun Quan","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T08:23:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable zero-shot performance across various NLP tasks. However, the potential of LLMs in personality detection, which involves identifying an individual's personality from their written texts, remains largely unexplored. Drawing inspiration from Psychological Questionnaires, which are carefully designed by psychologists to evaluate individual personality traits through a series of targeted items, we argue that these items can be regarded as a collection of well-structured chain-of-thought (CoT) processes. By i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.20256","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.20256/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.20256","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.20256v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.20256","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XPYGR42EUHX4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XPYGR42EUHX4YQPN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XPYGR42E","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29900","citing_title":"LLM-based Multimodal Personality Recognition via Facial Action Unit-Text Semantic Fusion","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.04005","citing_title":"Exploring a Gamified Personality Assessment Method through Interaction with LLM Agents Embodying Different Personalities","ref_index":143,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XPYGR42E"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XPYGR42E","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.20256&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XPYGR42EUHX4YQPNZRPSCEU54Y/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:09:04.244982+00:00"}