{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK","short_pith_number":"pith:XQCBNTDZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bc0416cc7939ee6cb0a9782aa7aa24b2ab3590c8d28a885c1b2ae652626808cd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.03557","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Signal-preserving CMB component separation with machine learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David W. Hogg, Fiona McCarthy, J. Colin Hill, William R. Coulton","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T16:10:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Analysis of microwave sky signals, such as the cosmic microwave background, often requires component separation with multi-frequency methods, where different signals are isolated by their frequency behaviors. Many so-called \"blind\" methods, such as the internal linear combination (ILC), make minimal assumptions about the spatial distribution of the signal or contaminants, and only assume knowledge of the frequency dependence of the signal. The ILC is a minimum-variance linear combination of the measured frequency maps. In the case of Gaussian, statistically isotropic fields, this is the optima"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.03557","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T16:10:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"65273bf40b2043f7585271946ae739e5e46ce652a3c7037ee3fc319b9bf9a9c3","abstract_canon_sha256":"7b6bc8b6aac137dc63c3c8c6863dd1800d294c75fbcdd2f5767bda6cc98de06d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.440402Z","signature_b64":"Kv8nHAvgZhK+KhQrwAZ4A95BgwWG9TdtmsoFDUGtgdzU/LYcsE86S5hgFKNTwzdsZYTeAxFpNfBxsLXIcnJSDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bc0416cc7939ee6cb0a9782aa7aa24b2ab3590c8d28a885c1b2ae652626808cd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439859Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439859Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Signal-preserving CMB component separation with machine learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David W. Hogg, Fiona McCarthy, J. Colin Hill, William R. Coulton","submitted_at":"2024-04-04T16:10:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Analysis of microwave sky signals, such as the cosmic microwave background, often requires component separation with multi-frequency methods, where different signals are isolated by their frequency behaviors. Many so-called \"blind\" methods, such as the internal linear combination (ILC), make minimal assumptions about the spatial distribution of the signal or contaminants, and only assume knowledge of the frequency dependence of the signal. The ILC is a minimum-variance linear combination of the measured frequency maps. In the case of Gaussian, statistically isotropic fields, this is the optima"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.03557","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.03557/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.03557","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.03557v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.03557","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XQCBNTDZHHXG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XQCBNTDZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03458","citing_title":"Comparison of Halo Model and Simulation Predictions for Projected-Field Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Cross-Correlations","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XQCBNTDZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XQCBNTDZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.03557&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XQCBNTDZHHXGZMFJPAVKPKREWK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:50:55.439918+00:00"}