{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM","short_pith_number":"pith:XQUINSI4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bc2886c91c95424ebdf803aeb989567b2423510ad6e248b0b8a74452bd68b02f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2301.10416","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AI vs. Human -- Differentiation Analysis of Scientific Content Generation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fan Yi, Jiawei Liu, Qikai Cheng, Wei Lu, Xiaozhong Liu, Yong Huang, Yongqiang Ma","submitted_at":"2023-01-24T04:23:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent neural language models have taken a significant step forward in producing remarkably controllable, fluent, and grammatical text. Although studies have found that AI-generated text is not distinguishable from human-written text for crowd-sourcing workers, there still exist errors in AI-generated text which are even subtler and harder to spot. We primarily focus on the scenario in which scientific AI writing assistant is deeply involved. First, we construct a feature description framework to distinguish between AI-generated text and human-written text from syntax, semantics, and pragmatic"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2301.10416","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-01-24T04:23:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"00c74f44e7194b190291da7304e86c25ed9c8278542c0f15902d49fa5a4d4a07","abstract_canon_sha256":"465157d51d857cf94f6f0a25bad335f09a33c4cd61d80da43cedf210578b1ce7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868774Z","signature_b64":"Jr5ljQO5KO3ikTNXLj03FOibXmdStGBk+FV58PdqvCzlyHwaqI2T7F5/i/GI50nS1yb5G1lH7jmtJ4oThFylBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bc2886c91c95424ebdf803aeb989567b2423510ad6e248b0b8a74452bd68b02f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868284Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868284Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AI vs. Human -- Differentiation Analysis of Scientific Content Generation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fan Yi, Jiawei Liu, Qikai Cheng, Wei Lu, Xiaozhong Liu, Yong Huang, Yongqiang Ma","submitted_at":"2023-01-24T04:23:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent neural language models have taken a significant step forward in producing remarkably controllable, fluent, and grammatical text. Although studies have found that AI-generated text is not distinguishable from human-written text for crowd-sourcing workers, there still exist errors in AI-generated text which are even subtler and harder to spot. We primarily focus on the scenario in which scientific AI writing assistant is deeply involved. First, we construct a feature description framework to distinguish between AI-generated text and human-written text from syntax, semantics, and pragmatic"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2301.10416","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2301.10416/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2301.10416","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2301.10416v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.10416","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XQUINSI4SVBE","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XQUINSI4SVBE5PPY","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XQUINSI4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19578","citing_title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XQUINSI4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XQUINSI4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2301.10416&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XQUINSI4SVBE5PPYAOXLTCKWPM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:40:52.868350+00:00"}