{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2","short_pith_number":"pith:XSGITVL3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bc8c89d57baaa5f0a00316acf89adf469f28dcdbd9d8d5be0ed1f098ce6b4b93","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.17256","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Latency-Aware Deep Learning Benchmark for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Attack and Fault Classification in Inverter-Dominated Power Grids","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Deep learning models classify power grid anomalies in under 15 ms but require 50 to 90 ms for complete inference.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.SY"],"primary_cat":"eess.SY","authors_text":"A.P. Sakis Meliopoulos, Emad Abukhousa, Saman Zonouz","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T04:57:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work introduces a latency-aware benchmarking framework for evaluating deep learning models in power system anomaly detection using high-fidelity, time-domain signals generated from an industry-grade electromagnetic transient simulator. Eight neural network architectures, ranging from MLPs to Transformers, were systematically evaluated on streaming datasets representing both physical faults and cyber-attacks in inverter-dominated networks. All models successfully classified two representative multi-event sequences in real time with sub-cycle response times below 15 ms. However, although cl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.17256","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SY","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T04:57:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.SY"],"title_canon_sha256":"1a865205d968f9d60bea76d84ca749a246e50f00efa0d513b7fda08ac6b9c78a","abstract_canon_sha256":"13723de569f66c4603fd56981dd7fbb29ce280960901fa074ccaf1af1e767622"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971704Z","signature_b64":"cDP/nLCWL6uF5WHemljpINdjvguYSlfZ9CRickcA5flOA88wLo2W+WNfI6bCEy33GIsRnPlbDIzg7akWzXWgBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bc8c89d57baaa5f0a00316acf89adf469f28dcdbd9d8d5be0ed1f098ce6b4b93","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.970956Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.970956Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Latency-Aware Deep Learning Benchmark for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Attack and Fault Classification in Inverter-Dominated Power Grids","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Deep learning models classify power grid anomalies in under 15 ms but require 50 to 90 ms for complete inference.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.SY"],"primary_cat":"eess.SY","authors_text":"A.P. Sakis Meliopoulos, Emad Abukhousa, Saman Zonouz","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T04:57:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work introduces a latency-aware benchmarking framework for evaluating deep learning models in power system anomaly detection using high-fidelity, time-domain signals generated from an industry-grade electromagnetic transient simulator. Eight neural network architectures, ranging from MLPs to Transformers, were systematically evaluated on streaming datasets representing both physical faults and cyber-attacks in inverter-dominated networks. All models successfully classified two representative multi-event sequences in real time with sub-cycle response times below 15 ms. However, although cl"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"All models successfully classified two representative multi-event sequences in real time with sub-cycle response times below 15 ms. However, although classification decisions occurred within one cycle, the end-to-end inference latency consistently exceeded three cycles, ranging from 50 to 90 ms. These results highlight a critical gap between algorithmic capability and protection-grade deployment.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the high-fidelity, time-domain signals generated from the industry-grade electromagnetic transient simulator accurately represent the behavior of real inverter-dominated power grids under both physical faults and cyber-attacks, allowing the benchmark results to inform real-world deployment decisions.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Benchmark of eight neural networks on simulated power grid data finds sub-cycle classification but 50-90 ms end-to-end latency, indicating a deployment gap.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Deep learning models classify power grid anomalies in under 15 ms but require 50 to 90 ms for complete inference.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"9fc529879e09fd6195db7cf63c3434d19c999487b473c290c5504d160ca45d71"},"source":{"id":"2605.17256","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"cd5c5ba6-cca1-47a7-8380-9e09fc36988b","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T23:24:24.271740Z","strongest_claim":"All models successfully classified two representative multi-event sequences in real time with sub-cycle response times below 15 ms. However, although classification decisions occurred within one cycle, the end-to-end inference latency consistently exceeded three cycles, ranging from 50 to 90 ms. These results highlight a critical gap between algorithmic capability and protection-grade deployment.","one_line_summary":"Benchmark of eight neural networks on simulated power grid data finds sub-cycle classification but 50-90 ms end-to-end latency, indicating a deployment gap.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the high-fidelity, time-domain signals generated from the industry-grade electromagnetic transient simulator accurately represent the behavior of real inverter-dominated power grids under both physical faults and cyber-attacks, allowing the benchmark results to inform real-world deployment decisions.","pith_extraction_headline":"Deep learning models classify power grid anomalies in under 15 ms but require 50 to 90 ms for complete inference."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.17256/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:31:20.282066Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:31:06.196027Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T22:01:57.855253Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:33:23.787057Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"6d7be1b7f882e454847ff1422fa43ba3b82e7fe066843378b89a8b2102904f18"},"references":{"count":11,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2021,"title":"Influence of inverter-based resources on microgrid protection: Part 1: Microgrids in radial distribution systems,","work_id":"127b75c9-627b-48fb-917e-aca58fea176b","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2012,"title":"Scpse: Security-oriented cyber-physical state estimation for power grid critical infrastructures,","work_id":"50e6d56e-9b2e-4bab-ab26-8a96c7b2cd5b","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Dynamic estimation-based protection and hidden failure detection and identification: Inverter-dominated power systems,","work_id":"e2e8fd1a-1f38-44d2-9c51-e595dc80a106","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Cnn-based transformer model for fault detection in power system networks,","work_id":"93299780-cc9e-4940-ac78-d45cf1d96a0e","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Deep machine learning model-based cyber-attacks detection in smart power systems,","work_id":"4b08efac-4a8e-45fa-9210-e2db650bee2e","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":11,"snapshot_sha256":"ae515ebc33e4919fb238bae02dc55328f53caf96a97fd89148ba62d54f728db2","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"ae3c362bd56f9eb544a93b5ff055160cd7ba360c46ea61a3a13f2712fae66bb4"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.17256","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.17256v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.17256","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XSGITVL3VKS7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XSGITVL3VKS7BIAD","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XSGITVL3","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSGITVL3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSGITVL3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.17256&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XSGITVL3VKS7BIADC2WPRGW7I2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:47.971065+00:00"}