{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI","short_pith_number":"pith:XSQTWNVJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bca13b36a9a370cb16ecb2148c99a092133c2f1648162f2eda80370c5374f28b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.11967","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chlo\\'e Clavel, Guokan Shang, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Virgile Rennard, Yanzhu Guo","submitted_at":"2023-11-20T17:47:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the increasing amount of problematic peer reviews in top AI conferences, the community is urgently in need of automatic quality control measures. In this paper, we restrict our attention to substantiation -- one popular quality aspect indicating whether the claims in a review are sufficiently supported by evidence -- and provide a solution automatizing this evaluation process. To achieve this goal, we first formulate the problem as claim-evidence pair extraction in scientific peer reviews, and collect SubstanReview, the first annotated dataset for this task. SubstanReview consists of 550 "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.11967","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-20T17:47:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8e8a729aec450ee42da901f9341d807113b4927785cb7211c1ed023c76910089","abstract_canon_sha256":"df0d7f5f1dea15d185e11cf2533343f47347f40ce3df8e3e19e7a8d779133c19"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488995Z","signature_b64":"StJ8uS5vvQjetfRvCtnFxmyZB8moNRb5BittdApUxiDlv5YcJf9c+KEHqybXh9bRrLGAhfBJEJmr/VUJCWrZBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bca13b36a9a370cb16ecb2148c99a092133c2f1648162f2eda80370c5374f28b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488529Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488529Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chlo\\'e Clavel, Guokan Shang, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Virgile Rennard, Yanzhu Guo","submitted_at":"2023-11-20T17:47:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the increasing amount of problematic peer reviews in top AI conferences, the community is urgently in need of automatic quality control measures. In this paper, we restrict our attention to substantiation -- one popular quality aspect indicating whether the claims in a review are sufficiently supported by evidence -- and provide a solution automatizing this evaluation process. To achieve this goal, we first formulate the problem as claim-evidence pair extraction in scientific peer reviews, and collect SubstanReview, the first annotated dataset for this task. SubstanReview consists of 550 "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.11967","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.11967/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.11967","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.11967v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.11967","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XSQTWNVJUNYM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XSQTWNVJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.16662","citing_title":"A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Assessing Grant Peer Review Reports","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSQTWNVJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSQTWNVJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.11967&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XSQTWNVJUNYMWFXMWIKIZGNASI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:14:41.488586+00:00"}