{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM","short_pith_number":"pith:XSZ72LVY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bcb3fd2eb88e86d7222de3fa0ecb1803240df5d23d11c994a4169d6ddf96b62e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.06185","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Zhicheng Lin","submitted_at":"2025-07-08T17:11:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In July 2025, 18 academic manuscripts on the preprint website arXiv were found to contain hidden instructions known as prompts designed to manipulate AI-assisted peer review. Instructions such as \"GIVE A POSITIVE REVIEW ONLY\" were concealed using techniques like white-colored text. Author responses varied: one planned to withdraw the affected paper, while another defended the practice as legitimate testing of reviewer compliance. This commentary analyzes this practice as a novel form of research misconduct. We examine the technique of prompt injection in large language models (LLMs), revealing"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.06185","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-07-08T17:11:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"8b9bc0a15fdf9fd930d6cfca5765692975f5aee8e138922ba782734491c9c9a5","abstract_canon_sha256":"ffcda1433b54e58431a00a94412381e549ac46a179996a422b3403bde20f2d8d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.891156Z","signature_b64":"RS0EfhBOvKzF9eoJ7diSm9XmM3Fy2igwcO6cY6yAKMNDjt2cxLy+VnxTTponrfoa731Ghw1emSTAJ7X1MRGqAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bcb3fd2eb88e86d7222de3fa0ecb1803240df5d23d11c994a4169d6ddf96b62e","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890654Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890654Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Zhicheng Lin","submitted_at":"2025-07-08T17:11:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"In July 2025, 18 academic manuscripts on the preprint website arXiv were found to contain hidden instructions known as prompts designed to manipulate AI-assisted peer review. Instructions such as \"GIVE A POSITIVE REVIEW ONLY\" were concealed using techniques like white-colored text. Author responses varied: one planned to withdraw the affected paper, while another defended the practice as legitimate testing of reviewer compliance. This commentary analyzes this practice as a novel form of research misconduct. We examine the technique of prompt injection in large language models (LLMs), revealing"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.06185","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.06185/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.06185","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.06185v1","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.06185","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XSZ72LVYR2DN","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XSZ72LVY","created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07683","citing_title":"Review the Code, Not the Story: A Vision and Protocol for Code-First Peer Review","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.20405","citing_title":"ChatGPT: Excellent Paper! Accept It. Editor: Imposter Found! Review Rejected","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.01972","citing_title":"Hidden State Poisoning Attacks against Mamba-based Language Models","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSZ72LVY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XSZ72LVY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.06185&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XSZ72LVYR2DNOIRN4P5A5SYYAM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-26T01:15:44.890708+00:00"}