{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD","short_pith_number":"pith:XV7CDBY5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bd7e21871d1975705932099f0bf16eb8e35f4eae0de6dc794948417f6d87397d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.00178","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A TEE-Based Architecture for Confidential and Dependable Process Attestation in Authorship Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A TEE architecture collects continuous process attestation evidence with hardware tamper resistance against adversarial platform owners.","cross_cats":["cs.AR","cs.OS"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"David Condrey","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:17:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process attestation systems verify that a continuous physical process, such as human authorship, actually occurred, rather than merely checking system state. These systems face a fundamental dependability challenge: the evidence collection infrastructure must remain available and tamper-resistant even when the attesting party controls the platform. Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) provide hardware-enforced isolation that can address this challenge, but their integration with continuous process attestation introduces novel resilience requirements not addressed by existing frameworks. We pr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.00178","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:17:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AR","cs.OS"],"title_canon_sha256":"e00f23bd851450c94918d90ef9b2a99ab092025b734cddb8a536e72d2ab025dc","abstract_canon_sha256":"c24fb1915e8d7f94978fe0350140f5935b3f66a4f4380d50371649e3c1b2ff5e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.754464Z","signature_b64":"h3ME0h+fmtSPrg0jklN+25dJn2Xlfbu7SgE4PQQtZ6pZxuv6LUnIowN2ZXd1Ek4GqHL0i2vmeoePdEmjWcT2Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bd7e21871d1975705932099f0bf16eb8e35f4eae0de6dc794948417f6d87397d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753490Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753490Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A TEE-Based Architecture for Confidential and Dependable Process Attestation in Authorship Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A TEE architecture collects continuous process attestation evidence with hardware tamper resistance against adversarial platform owners.","cross_cats":["cs.AR","cs.OS"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"David Condrey","submitted_at":"2026-02-26T20:17:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Process attestation systems verify that a continuous physical process, such as human authorship, actually occurred, rather than merely checking system state. These systems face a fundamental dependability challenge: the evidence collection infrastructure must remain available and tamper-resistant even when the attesting party controls the platform. Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) provide hardware-enforced isolation that can address this challenge, but their integration with continuous process attestation introduces novel resilience requirements not addressed by existing frameworks. We pr"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We present the first architecture for continuous process attestation evidence collection inside TEEs, providing hardware-backed tamper resistance against trust-inverted adversaries with graduated input assurance from software-channel integrity (Tier 1) through hardware-bound input (Tier 3).","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The security analysis derives formal bounds under combined threat models including trust inversion and TEE side channels, parameterized by a conjectural side-channel leakage bound esc that requires empirical validation.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"First TEE-based architecture for continuous process attestation with hardware tamper resistance, tiered assurance levels, Markov-chain dependability modeling, and resilient protocol achieving over 99.5% evidence chain availability.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A TEE architecture collects continuous process attestation evidence with hardware tamper resistance against adversarial platform owners.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"c7c5bf4ee0d9dd27fba7eba7ba8f303e5d083335b84a21445864b9999f990e3c"},"source":{"id":"2603.00178","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"ecdb3b78-e132-42fc-9931-81f6ef8c12d4","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T18:28:04.380216Z","strongest_claim":"We present the first architecture for continuous process attestation evidence collection inside TEEs, providing hardware-backed tamper resistance against trust-inverted adversaries with graduated input assurance from software-channel integrity (Tier 1) through hardware-bound input (Tier 3).","one_line_summary":"First TEE-based architecture for continuous process attestation with hardware tamper resistance, tiered assurance levels, Markov-chain dependability modeling, and resilient protocol achieving over 99.5% evidence chain availability.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The security analysis derives formal bounds under combined threat models including trust inversion and TEE side channels, parameterized by a conjectural side-channel leakage bound esc that requires empirical validation.","pith_extraction_headline":"A TEE architecture collects continuous process attestation evidence with hardware tamper resistance against adversarial platform owners."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2603.00178/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"d176a3ace8c39fd641cfd80b96f43b1526b347205ab56f6b05212d6b570b693d"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.00178","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.00178v3","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.00178","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XV7CDBY5DF2X","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJS","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XV7CDBY5","created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XV7CDBY5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XV7CDBY5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.00178&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7CDBY5DF2XAWJSBGPQX4LOXD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-26T01:03:26.753617+00:00"}