{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ","short_pith_number":"pith:XW6NOIER","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bdbcd72091450ac6f672400015865d4a52d36d5b8036f3f3e70f316c632c6800","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.06033","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Generative AI Solve Your In-Context Learning Problem? A Martingale Perspective","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Andrew Jesson, David Blei, Nicolas Beltran-Velez","submitted_at":"2024-12-08T19:03:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work is about estimating when a conditional generative model (CGM) can solve an in-context learning (ICL) problem. An in-context learning (ICL) problem comprises a CGM, a dataset, and a prediction task. The CGM could be a multi-modal foundation model; the dataset, a collection of patient histories, test results, and recorded diagnoses; and the prediction task to communicate a diagnosis to a new patient. A Bayesian interpretation of ICL assumes that the CGM computes a posterior predictive distribution over an unknown Bayesian model defining a joint distribution over latent explanations and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.06033","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2024-12-08T19:03:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"089155c0f86de08078ba6e788697571e33cfffee3971b1d84fd246a96d6c6371","abstract_canon_sha256":"eb16c959e99d497173d402cd7d5f253bf25fdc9008a8bd10add31946d5c6c2b6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.451033Z","signature_b64":"cqusrvcixRe9sn++0Hc42up8Hw2RjqQ9yrweVUboTne3BolzcHHQM6llZonzZbucdRnkXAU283p+ZlTFo7wIDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bdbcd72091450ac6f672400015865d4a52d36d5b8036f3f3e70f316c632c6800","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450556Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450556Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Generative AI Solve Your In-Context Learning Problem? A Martingale Perspective","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Andrew Jesson, David Blei, Nicolas Beltran-Velez","submitted_at":"2024-12-08T19:03:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work is about estimating when a conditional generative model (CGM) can solve an in-context learning (ICL) problem. An in-context learning (ICL) problem comprises a CGM, a dataset, and a prediction task. The CGM could be a multi-modal foundation model; the dataset, a collection of patient histories, test results, and recorded diagnoses; and the prediction task to communicate a diagnosis to a new patient. A Bayesian interpretation of ICL assumes that the CGM computes a posterior predictive distribution over an unknown Bayesian model defining a joint distribution over latent explanations and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.06033","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.06033/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.06033","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.06033v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.06033","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XW6NOIERIUFM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XW6NOIERIUFMN5TS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XW6NOIER","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.11768","citing_title":"LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XW6NOIER"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XW6NOIER","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.06033&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XW6NOIERIUFMN5TSIAABLBS5JJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:13.450613+00:00"}