{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO","short_pith_number":"pith:XXFKDILX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bdcaa1a177be75919ed795a05c6e316bb4898de99d4094550df263444df539b1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.12215","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Proper Scoring Rules","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, Paul Hofman, Yusuf Sale","submitted_at":"2024-04-18T14:20:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Uncertainty representation and quantification are paramount in machine learning and constitute an important prerequisite for safety-critical applications. In this paper, we propose novel measures for the quantification of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty based on proper scoring rules, which are loss functions with the meaningful property that they incentivize the learner to predict ground-truth (conditional) probabilities. We assume two common representations of (epistemic) uncertainty, namely, in terms of a credal set, i.e. a set of probability distributions, or a second-order distribution"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.12215","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-04-18T14:20:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"d0f159b2de06c15d8d5efba1b4e689767bda7eb5b25ab779fcf448a4e21ffe11","abstract_canon_sha256":"b870c11e9746be5bf32cde1a980276e12c03b01f7f82c199747c201a78a0a057"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.244004Z","signature_b64":"6GXF3KRzhuYVtvf2Fx3rITDp6gDTMnSQ+BrS4ohq7YpZuzaYA9h9howSeivQTxvczQ/n4Gb9Bb5m9jLQADrSBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bdcaa1a177be75919ed795a05c6e316bb4898de99d4094550df263444df539b1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243545Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243545Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Proper Scoring Rules","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, Paul Hofman, Yusuf Sale","submitted_at":"2024-04-18T14:20:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Uncertainty representation and quantification are paramount in machine learning and constitute an important prerequisite for safety-critical applications. In this paper, we propose novel measures for the quantification of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty based on proper scoring rules, which are loss functions with the meaningful property that they incentivize the learner to predict ground-truth (conditional) probabilities. We assume two common representations of (epistemic) uncertainty, namely, in terms of a credal set, i.e. a set of probability distributions, or a second-order distribution"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.12215","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.12215/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.12215","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.12215v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.12215","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XXFKDILXXZ2Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XXFKDILX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25108","citing_title":"The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27804","citing_title":"Methods for Uncertainty Representation in Risk Management: A Comparative Review and Decision-Oriented Framework","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.15176","citing_title":"Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measure","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XXFKDILX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XXFKDILX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.12215&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XXFKDILXXZ2ZDHWXSWQFY3RRNO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:09:52.243608+00:00"}