{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF","short_pith_number":"pith:XY2CNPRZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"be3426be3919f70a89db5b59ebc98eb970bf0cf015398d1ac8a9456abe9969ae","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.06150","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"What makes a good concept anyway ?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"James Geller, Naren Khatwani","submitted_at":"2024-09-10T01:52:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"A good medical ontology is expected to cover its domain completely and correctly. On the other hand, large ontologies are hard to build, hard to understand, and hard to maintain. Thus, adding new concepts (often multi-word concepts) to an existing ontology must be done judiciously. Only \"good\" concepts should be added; however, it is difficult to define what makes a concept good. In this research, we propose a metric to measure the goodness of a concept. We identified factors that appear to influence goodness judgments of medical experts and combined them into a single metric. These factors in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.06150","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2024-09-10T01:52:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"7a4abe06d4fd38cab00d2e8f11108e46378a4d8610223fae1a55b8460c151ba4","abstract_canon_sha256":"1b2da5fb75a8acd73c480d3a988a8f6816f21f5d2cd36dcb44fe1233de1bcfe8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728626Z","signature_b64":"ZhU9MmCDL1P/XawCwLifE+VidF/L3n9tDeIGmXuDTiwpZDEKNpFz5hGAZZelrkoHWW4lvgsXNVb0Wm/oSAWjDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"be3426be3919f70a89db5b59ebc98eb970bf0cf015398d1ac8a9456abe9969ae","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728140Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728140Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"What makes a good concept anyway ?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"James Geller, Naren Khatwani","submitted_at":"2024-09-10T01:52:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"A good medical ontology is expected to cover its domain completely and correctly. On the other hand, large ontologies are hard to build, hard to understand, and hard to maintain. Thus, adding new concepts (often multi-word concepts) to an existing ontology must be done judiciously. Only \"good\" concepts should be added; however, it is difficult to define what makes a concept good. In this research, we propose a metric to measure the goodness of a concept. We identified factors that appear to influence goodness judgments of medical experts and combined them into a single metric. These factors in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.06150","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.06150/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.06150","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.06150v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.06150","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XY2CNPRZDH3Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XY2CNPRZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.11441","citing_title":"Ontology Matching with Large Language Models and Prioritized Depth-First Search","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XY2CNPRZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XY2CNPRZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.06150&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XY2CNPRZDH3QVCO3LNM6XSMOXF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:05:02.728187+00:00"}