{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL","short_pith_number":"pith:XZAQOABC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"be41070022a43ac1929078b15603681ae4560b29db21aacb1cb103930e82b679","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1408.0292","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Consistent Use of the Standard Model Effective Potential","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Anders Andreassen, Matthew D. Schwartz, William Frost","submitted_at":"2014-08-01T20:01:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The stability of the Standard Model is determined by the true minimum of the effective Higgs potential. We show that the potential at its minimum when computed by the traditional method is strongly dependent on the gauge parameter. It moreover depends on the scale where the potential is calculated. We provide a consistent method for determining absolute stability independent of both gauge and calculation scale, order by order in perturbation theory. This leads to a revised stability bounds mH > (129.4 \\pm 2.3) GeV and mt < (171.2 \\pm 0.3)GeV. We also show how to evaluate the effect of new phys"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1408.0292","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2014-08-01T20:01:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d68240a18ebbe6ed24ff82d7d3b4099896a5334f0fc6943452a7100c0e587cbb","abstract_canon_sha256":"a39c84ca8b4401ba13ead2be52135d28507c9be480b135392227b59af562df2a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269884Z","signature_b64":"JIj21gavgzUV5z2TkLbcVxp1TG14CdxdBaDRSKOh6gfdDqVDzLgV20P7NKxnzTwgLqoW9r0PoG2Pksfa/kHsBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"be41070022a43ac1929078b15603681ae4560b29db21aacb1cb103930e82b679","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269243Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269243Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Consistent Use of the Standard Model Effective Potential","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Anders Andreassen, Matthew D. Schwartz, William Frost","submitted_at":"2014-08-01T20:01:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The stability of the Standard Model is determined by the true minimum of the effective Higgs potential. We show that the potential at its minimum when computed by the traditional method is strongly dependent on the gauge parameter. It moreover depends on the scale where the potential is calculated. We provide a consistent method for determining absolute stability independent of both gauge and calculation scale, order by order in perturbation theory. This leads to a revised stability bounds mH > (129.4 \\pm 2.3) GeV and mt < (171.2 \\pm 0.3)GeV. We also show how to evaluate the effect of new phys"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1408.0292","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1408.0292","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1408.0292v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1408.0292","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269343+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XZAQOABCUQ5M","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:57.508820+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:57.508820+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XZAQOABC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:57.508820+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21492","citing_title":"Solving Cosmological Puzzles using Finite Temperature $\\nu$SMEFT","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05972","citing_title":"Background Fields Meet the Heat Kernel: Gauge Invariance and RGEs without diagrams","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZAQOABC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZAQOABC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1408.0292&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XZAQOABCUQ5MDEUQPCYVMA3IDL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269343+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:31:11.269343+00:00"}