{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU","short_pith_number":"pith:XZATH76T","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"be4133ffd3d77d5a0ec9a52e8473403538923ea704677404e988f5f8d1cbf520","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.27066","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"SciFigAlign: Scoring Scientific Figures by Fine-tuned Alignment of Visuals with Manuscript Evidence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Chengkun Yue, Chuanzhi Xu, Huiqi Liang, Pengfei Ye, Weidong Cai, Zhanlin Cui, Zihan Deng","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T15:54:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy. However, if we apply traditional image assessment methods to scientific figure quality assessment, limitations emerge: classic IQA models capture perceptual quality or aesthetics but cannot judge whether a figure serves the paper's scientific argument; CLIP-based methods assess generic image-text correspondence, yet lack understanding of manuscript context; "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.27066","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T15:54:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"b7b10ac25209e1b7647b58b9852cdcce4b660fe39eccb5a6058bf21a0929c68e","abstract_canon_sha256":"8ecb3b3721a5f92ab68f570a90593660dfa36e4193bdeb0f8ca6f09e0f94e5c9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"be4133ffd3d77d5a0ec9a52e8473403538923ea704677404e988f5f8d1cbf520","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.254833Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.254833Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"SciFigAlign: Scoring Scientific Figures by Fine-tuned Alignment of Visuals with Manuscript Evidence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Chengkun Yue, Chuanzhi Xu, Huiqi Liang, Pengfei Ye, Weidong Cai, Zhanlin Cui, Zihan Deng","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T15:54:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy. However, if we apply traditional image assessment methods to scientific figure quality assessment, limitations emerge: classic IQA models capture perceptual quality or aesthetics but cannot judge whether a figure serves the paper's scientific argument; CLIP-based methods assess generic image-text correspondence, yet lack understanding of manuscript context; "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.27066","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.27066/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.27066","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.27066v1","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.27066","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XZATH76T256V","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XZATH76T256VUDWJ","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XZATH76T","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZATH76T"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZATH76T","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.27066&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XZATH76T256VUDWJUUXII42AGU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-30T01:23:29.259830+00:00"}