{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4","short_pith_number":"pith:XZP7GHZF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"be5ff31f25cb2791b706a983c14f05b72527e7bd46c5fabfebe0888f2763614a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.18220","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Asymptotically safe -- canonical quantum gravity junction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Thomas Thiemann","submitted_at":"2024-04-28T15:31:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"The canonical (CQG) and asymptotically safe (ASQG) approach to quantum gravity share to be both non-perturbative programmes. However, apart from that they seem to differ in several aspects such as: 1. Signature: CQG is Lorentzian while ASQG is mostly Euclidian. 2. Background Independence (BI): CQG is manifesly BI while ASQG is apparently not. 3. Truncations: CQG is apparently free of truncations while ASQG makes heavy use of them.\n  The purpose of the present work is to either overcome actual differences or to explain why apparent differences are actually absent. Thereby we intend to enhance t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.18220","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2024-04-28T15:31:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"931fecf4c1747f5fc8b7b9091bb70623bdc18f4e5ce69b183075eea64bd98d5e","abstract_canon_sha256":"833c4338537f95bb206e52989935a83c2dddddd6045ddb462eecb08bbac6a2e9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078461Z","signature_b64":"FvWq0rvA+xEAWeAIOhvJ8xK4+xejbMn6vmcF41ODQX4S508/XN+hphbGIu8yD9s87jqRizQ+KOAZkHqpkVC8Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"be5ff31f25cb2791b706a983c14f05b72527e7bd46c5fabfebe0888f2763614a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.077991Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.077991Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Asymptotically safe -- canonical quantum gravity junction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Thomas Thiemann","submitted_at":"2024-04-28T15:31:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"The canonical (CQG) and asymptotically safe (ASQG) approach to quantum gravity share to be both non-perturbative programmes. However, apart from that they seem to differ in several aspects such as: 1. Signature: CQG is Lorentzian while ASQG is mostly Euclidian. 2. Background Independence (BI): CQG is manifesly BI while ASQG is apparently not. 3. Truncations: CQG is apparently free of truncations while ASQG makes heavy use of them.\n  The purpose of the present work is to either overcome actual differences or to explain why apparent differences are actually absent. Thereby we intend to enhance t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.18220","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.18220/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.18220","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.18220v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.18220","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XZP7GHZFZMTZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XZP7GHZF","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06657","citing_title":"Towards gauge independence in asymptotically safe quantum gravity","ref_index":95,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21522","citing_title":"Asymptotically safe quantum gravity and its phenomenology -- a review","ref_index":257,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.23808","citing_title":"Towards theory constraints on ultralight dark matter from quantum gravity","ref_index":191,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZP7GHZF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XZP7GHZF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.18220&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XZP7GHZFZMTZDNYGVGB4CTYFW4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:13:00.078044+00:00"}