{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA","short_pith_number":"pith:Y22I3E4W","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c6b48d9396d2414fe0df0031114bdd1827e2d71e4361da29c7add9071581ae36","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2012.14064","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparison of prismatic cohomology and derived de Rham cohomology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.NT"],"primary_cat":"math.AG","authors_text":"Shizhang Li, Tong Liu","submitted_at":"2020-12-28T02:23:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We establish a comparison isomorphism between prismatic cohomology and derived de Rham cohomology respecting various structures, such as their Frobenius actions and filtrations. As an application, when $X$ is a proper smooth formal scheme over $\\mathcal O_K$ with $K$ being a $p$-adic field, we improve Breuil--Caruso's theory on comparison between torsion crystalline cohomology and torsion \\'etale cohomology."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2012.14064","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.AG","submitted_at":"2020-12-28T02:23:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.NT"],"title_canon_sha256":"99bf88766b8b88646ab1f46a09369bcc903d5f7f892633f424ab67c9b5eeca2d","abstract_canon_sha256":"15d6cc8cb6037b7e30f27e8b9d50bb4ba59f9f6af734eade94be4dfd474814b6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200884Z","signature_b64":"7mi2YuTICyh3xfdSNK8CjHrgwTEFf/MpCRI19KZmXxDghgy1jH5ExyNrAiHI8v7D7qVZvTX0t+Pal1gXp0F4DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c6b48d9396d2414fe0df0031114bdd1827e2d71e4361da29c7add9071581ae36","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200518Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200518Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparison of prismatic cohomology and derived de Rham cohomology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.NT"],"primary_cat":"math.AG","authors_text":"Shizhang Li, Tong Liu","submitted_at":"2020-12-28T02:23:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We establish a comparison isomorphism between prismatic cohomology and derived de Rham cohomology respecting various structures, such as their Frobenius actions and filtrations. As an application, when $X$ is a proper smooth formal scheme over $\\mathcal O_K$ with $K$ being a $p$-adic field, we improve Breuil--Caruso's theory on comparison between torsion crystalline cohomology and torsion \\'etale cohomology."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2012.14064","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2012.14064/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2012.14064","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2012.14064v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2012.14064","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Y22I3E4W2JAU","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Y22I3E4W","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.17631","citing_title":"An integral comparison of crystalline and de Rham cohomology","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y22I3E4W"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y22I3E4W","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2012.14064&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Y22I3E4W2JAU7YG7AAYRCS65DA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:12:34.200584+00:00"}