{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB","short_pith_number":"pith:Y2M6VUIS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c699ead112a0550afe9cff71b6d519485100ecc7e29147171373b0b762e34b62","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.17439","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum state testing with restricted measurements","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jayadev Acharya, Yuhan Liu","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T17:48:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study quantum state testing where the goal is to test whether $\\rho=\\rho_0\\in\\mathbb{C}^{d\\times d}$ or $\\|\\rho-\\rho_0\\|_1>\\varepsilon$, given $n$ copies of $\\rho$ and a known state description $\\rho_0$. In practice, not all measurements can be easily applied, even using unentangled measurements where each copy is measured separately. We develop an information-theoretic framework that yields unified copy complexity lower bounds for restricted families of non-adaptive measurements through a novel measurement information channel. Using this framework, we obtain the optimal bounds for a natura"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.17439","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T17:48:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC"],"title_canon_sha256":"ae161f69c4d657d0d04dfc5a987a98f79297f49e67ab43da68d0aabca42b6732","abstract_canon_sha256":"027d6e4e28ff83e70a73a24c3e78e5e840e3b8679aab408e9bb36c8469ea586e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924838Z","signature_b64":"NTL1bGU55k+oXtAhPqfV/E/CMoS8TMar5MU8FebTSLvYIviknyGvJB+uRMycxYLpPEoD8IOOZNkd1b74r+wnAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c699ead112a0550afe9cff71b6d519485100ecc7e29147171373b0b762e34b62","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924359Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924359Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum state testing with restricted measurements","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jayadev Acharya, Yuhan Liu","submitted_at":"2024-08-30T17:48:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study quantum state testing where the goal is to test whether $\\rho=\\rho_0\\in\\mathbb{C}^{d\\times d}$ or $\\|\\rho-\\rho_0\\|_1>\\varepsilon$, given $n$ copies of $\\rho$ and a known state description $\\rho_0$. In practice, not all measurements can be easily applied, even using unentangled measurements where each copy is measured separately. We develop an information-theoretic framework that yields unified copy complexity lower bounds for restricted families of non-adaptive measurements through a novel measurement information channel. Using this framework, we obtain the optimal bounds for a natura"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.17439","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.17439/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.17439","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.17439v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.17439","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Y2M6VUISUBKQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Y2M6VUIS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31753","citing_title":"Distributed Property Testing with (Quantum) Carrier Pigeons: Tight Bounds on State Certification","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07460","citing_title":"Optimal Quantum State Testing Even with Limited Entanglement","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y2M6VUIS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y2M6VUIS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.17439&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2M6VUISUBKQV7U475Y3NVIZJB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:01:19.924416+00:00"}