{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB","short_pith_number":"pith:Y2RWXFMV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c6a36b9595fc44587e5410cf03d5f08858fcc261c25881a068c290581f6d1271","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.17100","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automatic cross-validation in structured models: Is it time to leave out leave-one-out?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.AP","stat.CO"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"A. Adin, A. Lenzi, E. Krainski, H. Rue, J. Mart\\'inez-Minaya, Z. Liu","submitted_at":"2023-11-28T08:01:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) might not be suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of models incorporating structured random effects. In such cases, the correlation between the training and test sets could have a notable impact on the model's prediction error. To overcome this issue, an automatic group construction procedure for leave-group-out cross validation (LGOCV) has recently emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing predictive performance measurement in structured models. The purpose of this paper is (i) to compare LOOCV and LGOCV within st"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.17100","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-11-28T08:01:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP","stat.CO"],"title_canon_sha256":"578229b81adeddfd35701816aa95add552af1b68038169068f52df23c41c855f","abstract_canon_sha256":"35cc187c77df101300762e4f998cc0c66d74f0dc05eeea669b327e9701c25391"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437701Z","signature_b64":"vvS59z7oOftWp3j1MryiyGSvBO20z7CB0Lm2q2HUKf3x+wiTUNSUdNyYPexkCZpDmvmg4QhTcEm4073f+TYKDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c6a36b9595fc44587e5410cf03d5f08858fcc261c25881a068c290581f6d1271","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437195Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437195Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automatic cross-validation in structured models: Is it time to leave out leave-one-out?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.AP","stat.CO"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"A. Adin, A. Lenzi, E. Krainski, H. Rue, J. Mart\\'inez-Minaya, Z. Liu","submitted_at":"2023-11-28T08:01:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) might not be suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of models incorporating structured random effects. In such cases, the correlation between the training and test sets could have a notable impact on the model's prediction error. To overcome this issue, an automatic group construction procedure for leave-group-out cross validation (LGOCV) has recently emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing predictive performance measurement in structured models. The purpose of this paper is (i) to compare LOOCV and LGOCV within st"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.17100","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.17100/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.17100","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.17100v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.17100","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Y2RWXFMV7RCF","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Y2RWXFMV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.22334","citing_title":"Linking climate and dengue in the Philippines using a two-stage Bayesian spatio-temporal model","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y2RWXFMV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y2RWXFMV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.17100&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Y2RWXFMV7RCFQ7SUCDHQHVPQRB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:08.437254+00:00"}