{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR","short_pith_number":"pith:Y7JUXPC4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c7d34bbc5ccd2a9aba9cdb034bf4cbc4638360e6e5e617a9b6f2cbef39d5ac8f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.10223","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparison of the Wald, Wilson, and adjusted Wilson Confidence Intervals for Proportions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.CO"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Nabil Kahouadji","submitted_at":"2025-08-13T22:20:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The standard confidence interval for a population proportion covered in the overwhelming majority of introductory and intermediate statistics textbooks surprisingly remains the Wald confidence interval despite having a poor coverage probability, especially for small sample sizes or when the unknown population proportion is close to either 0 or 1. Using the mean coverage probability, and for some sample sizes, Agresti and Coull showed not only that the 95\\% Wilson confidence interval performs better, but also showed that 95\\% adjusted Wilson of type 4 confidence interval, obtained by simply add"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.10223","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-08-13T22:20:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.CO"],"title_canon_sha256":"d5bcf89130f320ce5c2cc4062f39a65b2ea89dc2e874ccfc9fbaa2bf3342fd37","abstract_canon_sha256":"9ec99bbcb70596848c521772ab144519cb73dc54f5ab832b0eabb7ad961d8187"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.595144Z","signature_b64":"6MiMNX1AUJyM7tdW0Q7RmeJjAdj0MYNaSwIihZOjZ7n1SH+U2AAnhyFpxzzKlgn7yyjtD6Dalla5d+nzqGIDBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c7d34bbc5ccd2a9aba9cdb034bf4cbc4638360e6e5e617a9b6f2cbef39d5ac8f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594681Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594681Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparison of the Wald, Wilson, and adjusted Wilson Confidence Intervals for Proportions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.CO"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Nabil Kahouadji","submitted_at":"2025-08-13T22:20:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The standard confidence interval for a population proportion covered in the overwhelming majority of introductory and intermediate statistics textbooks surprisingly remains the Wald confidence interval despite having a poor coverage probability, especially for small sample sizes or when the unknown population proportion is close to either 0 or 1. Using the mean coverage probability, and for some sample sizes, Agresti and Coull showed not only that the 95\\% Wilson confidence interval performs better, but also showed that 95\\% adjusted Wilson of type 4 confidence interval, obtained by simply add"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.10223","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.10223/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.10223","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.10223v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.10223","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Y7JUXPC4ZUVJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Y7JUXPC4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26422","citing_title":"Estimating Uncertainty in Classifier Performance with Applications to Large Language Models and Nested Data","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y7JUXPC4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y7JUXPC4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.10223&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7JUXPC4ZUVJVOU43MBUX5GLYR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:53:51.594731+00:00"}