{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72","short_pith_number":"pith:Y7ZI2YVC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c7f28d62a249513ddd5cfc40d8cbc7fea7ccc63a9861c89554fc13ff84fb48e8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.19115","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automated Code Review Using Large Language Models at Ericsson: An Experience Report","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"A K Raghavan, Giriprasad Sridhara, Hamender Singh, Joy Bose, Nishrith Saini, Ricardo Britto, Shweta Ramesh, Sujoy Roychowdhury","submitted_at":"2025-07-25T09:50:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Code review is one of the primary means of assuring the quality of released software along with testing and static analysis. However, code review requires experienced developers who may not always have the time to perform an in-depth review of code. Thus, automating code review can help alleviate the cognitive burden on experienced software developers allowing them to focus on their primary activities of writing code to add new features and fix bugs. In this paper, we describe our experience in using Large Language Models towards automating the code review process in Ericsson. We describe the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.19115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-07-25T09:50:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d5a593195b0d58a8c1a0c937b5afa80d8dda6dd34bc7438197500e440a7563f0","abstract_canon_sha256":"a82429923005fd81679d8d2d23281ca0e6bb178e134956246d430ce9092c04ab"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524463Z","signature_b64":"O/eHr3O12cgsVW5kjWtuWWulRF6dIGMZJ60A8q9tNVeoIGYyo+t9iUJGudq1xng5Qh3Yw9Jrqwv+HCi2XxWXDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c7f28d62a249513ddd5cfc40d8cbc7fea7ccc63a9861c89554fc13ff84fb48e8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.523971Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.523971Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automated Code Review Using Large Language Models at Ericsson: An Experience Report","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"A K Raghavan, Giriprasad Sridhara, Hamender Singh, Joy Bose, Nishrith Saini, Ricardo Britto, Shweta Ramesh, Sujoy Roychowdhury","submitted_at":"2025-07-25T09:50:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Code review is one of the primary means of assuring the quality of released software along with testing and static analysis. However, code review requires experienced developers who may not always have the time to perform an in-depth review of code. Thus, automating code review can help alleviate the cognitive burden on experienced software developers allowing them to focus on their primary activities of writing code to add new features and fix bugs. In this paper, we describe our experience in using Large Language Models towards automating the code review process in Ericsson. We describe the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.19115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.19115/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.19115","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.19115v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.19115","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"Y7ZI2YVCJFIT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"Y7ZI2YVC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03196","citing_title":"From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72","json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y7ZI2YVC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/Y7ZI2YVC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.19115&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/Y7ZI2YVCJFIT3XK47RANRS6H72/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:23.524030+00:00"}