{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU","short_pith_number":"pith:YAB5KYAG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c003d560068658330d86816de5b84d7d325567a9360ac92897eb5535dc5e1108","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2008.08597","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is SMEFT Enough?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Dave Sutherland, Nathaniel Craig, Timothy Cohen, Xiaochuan Lu","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T18:00:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are two canonical approaches to treating the Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory (EFT): Standard Model EFT (SMEFT), expressed in the electroweak symmetric phase utilizing the Higgs doublet, and Higgs EFT (HEFT), expressed in the broken phase utilizing the physical Higgs boson and an independent set of Goldstone bosons. HEFT encompasses SMEFT, so understanding whether SMEFT is sufficient motivates identifying UV theories that require HEFT as their low energy limit. This distinction is complicated by field redefinitions that obscure the naive differences between the two EFTs. By re"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2008.08597","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T18:00:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f74d7bd66572cf9248c39fd937305d873d0b98d8e3a0833514e17deb888c4005","abstract_canon_sha256":"bcf8a0575e2db4c39d2cd4b715939eb4a5a65deb3526b981ee3b3b4a13093f3c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450411Z","signature_b64":"KACexMBS4seZd1k7M/cXchSpqqBn1KtYKZLLNpT5bEf2mN52AhN5S8K5Rhq1tKzjg3Qta2Yuz6B9mec+TJEDCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c003d560068658330d86816de5b84d7d325567a9360ac92897eb5535dc5e1108","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.449977Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.449977Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is SMEFT Enough?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Dave Sutherland, Nathaniel Craig, Timothy Cohen, Xiaochuan Lu","submitted_at":"2020-08-19T18:00:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are two canonical approaches to treating the Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory (EFT): Standard Model EFT (SMEFT), expressed in the electroweak symmetric phase utilizing the Higgs doublet, and Higgs EFT (HEFT), expressed in the broken phase utilizing the physical Higgs boson and an independent set of Goldstone bosons. HEFT encompasses SMEFT, so understanding whether SMEFT is sufficient motivates identifying UV theories that require HEFT as their low energy limit. This distinction is complicated by field redefinitions that obscure the naive differences between the two EFTs. By re"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2008.08597","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2008.08597/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2008.08597","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2008.08597v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.08597","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YAB5KYAGQZMD","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMG","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YAB5KYAG","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17151","citing_title":"Supersymmetric geometry in non-supersymmetric effective field theory","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00136","citing_title":"The left-cut for partial waves in terms of physical amplitudes","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04826","citing_title":"Kinematic Riffs and Interference Effects in Triple Higgs Production in the N2HDM","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23410","citing_title":"The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20099","citing_title":"Geometric Amplitudes: A Covariant Functional Approach for Massless Scalar Theories","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YAB5KYAG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YAB5KYAG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2008.08597&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YAB5KYAGQZMDGDMGQFW6LOCNPU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:04:17.450031+00:00"}