{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX","short_pith_number":"pith:YAJH2DKT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c0127d0d534f24797fc79cf724676cadc998f0d207d868e40342ddf8219321c0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2510.11503","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"People use fast and flat simulation to reason about new games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","authors_text":"Adrian Weller, Cedegao E. Zhang, Graham Todd, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Katherine M. Collins, Lionel Wong, Mauricio Barba da Costa, Samuel J. Cheyette, Thomas L. Griffiths","submitted_at":"2025-10-13T15:12:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"Games have long been a microcosm for studying planning and reasoning in both natural and artificial intelligence (AI), often focusing on expert-level or even super-human play. But real life also pushes human intelligence along a different frontier, requiring people to flexibly navigate decision-making problems that they have never thought about before. Here, we use novice gameplay to study how people reason about new problem settings. Through a series of large-scale behavioral studies with over 1000 participants and 121 two-player strategic board games (almost all novel to our participants), w"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2510.11503","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","submitted_at":"2025-10-13T15:12:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"60c39fc6075c256fc66e014ff2d7e322e8d12c404534917ab1d4c90105abd3d5","abstract_canon_sha256":"a931e2a6735b2d631bb5f7fefda827a5d413df6fe0575dc38edea8eeb29853aa"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.966262Z","signature_b64":"stqccQN/Zd3DxpgftyFoxK1I3qT+WTH2dBqcE1yyUZ4EF2/iDf0Iqsy8XzmDs1ajfuyHvGGFOoPMkcf0g7LUAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c0127d0d534f24797fc79cf724676cadc998f0d207d868e40342ddf8219321c0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965220Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965220Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"People use fast and flat simulation to reason about new games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","authors_text":"Adrian Weller, Cedegao E. Zhang, Graham Todd, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Katherine M. Collins, Lionel Wong, Mauricio Barba da Costa, Samuel J. Cheyette, Thomas L. Griffiths","submitted_at":"2025-10-13T15:12:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"Games have long been a microcosm for studying planning and reasoning in both natural and artificial intelligence (AI), often focusing on expert-level or even super-human play. But real life also pushes human intelligence along a different frontier, requiring people to flexibly navigate decision-making problems that they have never thought about before. Here, we use novice gameplay to study how people reason about new problem settings. Through a series of large-scale behavioral studies with over 1000 participants and 121 two-player strategic board games (almost all novel to our participants), w"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2510.11503","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2510.11503/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2510.11503","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2510.11503v2","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2510.11503","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YAJH2DKTJ4SH","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76H","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YAJH2DKT","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YAJH2DKT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YAJH2DKT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2510.11503&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YAJH2DKTJ4SHS76HTT3SIZ3MVX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:46.965736+00:00"}