{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5","short_pith_number":"pith:YB4KI4TT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c078a47273a6e3219aadbe9d01d255477fe28e7e153ac2a28f69c0c3a911b8fb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1706.02168","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Testing Ambiguity and Machina Preferences Within a Quantum-theoretic Framework for Decision-making","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","authors_text":"Catarina Moreira, Diederik Aerts, Sandro Sozzo, Suzette Geriente","submitted_at":"2017-06-06T08:48:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Machina thought experiments pose to major non-expected utility models challenges that are similar to those posed by the Ellsberg thought experiments to subjective expected utility theory (SEUT). We test human choices in the `Ellsberg three-color example', confirming typical ambiguity aversion patterns, and the `Machina 50/51 and reflection examples', partially confirming the preferences hypothesized by Machina. Then, we show that a quantum-theoretic framework for decision-making under uncertainty recently elaborated by some of us allows faithful modeling of all data on the Ellsberg and Mac"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1706.02168","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","submitted_at":"2017-06-06T08:48:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.GN","q-fin.MF"],"title_canon_sha256":"89a466d72e574f2c1bf1bae3b30102d242479c47e5d515ece90cd6c31e2c1084","abstract_canon_sha256":"1830017b9c96130a1c3362dd82192b08b13f85bdf92e20b02dd109c012c47c42"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.522522Z","signature_b64":"/pcjQRMdYSuOIyEnUnv6ksyqlQyamGrsg3w9HKi2bkR3JzRcyLSsZS5EVAOLMqrqeGEbI/2JATcmVz6ku2mxBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c078a47273a6e3219aadbe9d01d255477fe28e7e153ac2a28f69c0c3a911b8fb","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521828Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521828Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Testing Ambiguity and Machina Preferences Within a Quantum-theoretic Framework for Decision-making","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.MF"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.EC","authors_text":"Catarina Moreira, Diederik Aerts, Sandro Sozzo, Suzette Geriente","submitted_at":"2017-06-06T08:48:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Machina thought experiments pose to major non-expected utility models challenges that are similar to those posed by the Ellsberg thought experiments to subjective expected utility theory (SEUT). We test human choices in the `Ellsberg three-color example', confirming typical ambiguity aversion patterns, and the `Machina 50/51 and reflection examples', partially confirming the preferences hypothesized by Machina. Then, we show that a quantum-theoretic framework for decision-making under uncertainty recently elaborated by some of us allows faithful modeling of all data on the Ellsberg and Mac"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1706.02168","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1706.02168","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521931+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1706.02168v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521931+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1706.02168","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521931+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YB4KI4TTU3RS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:56.362134+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:56.362134+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YB4KI4TT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:56.362134+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YB4KI4TT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YB4KI4TT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1706.02168&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YB4KI4TTU3RSDGVNX2OQDUSVI5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521931+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.521931+00:00"}