{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM","short_pith_number":"pith:YCCGT5R7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c08469f63fa4f34524cb889c2228816b09bde976a5aef1ee3151c6eb96aad827","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.12660","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable Scientific Analogies after Structure Abduction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Deqing Yang, Jiangjie Chen, Siyu Yuan, Xuyang Ge, Yanghua Xiao","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T03:04:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"The vital role of analogical reasoning in human cognition allows us to grasp novel concepts by linking them with familiar ones through shared relational structures. Despite the attention previous research has given to word analogies, this work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook the structures that underpin these analogies, raising questions about the efficacy of word analogies as a measure of analogical reasoning skills akin to human cognition. In response to this, our paper introduces a task of analogical structure abduction, grounded in cognitive psychology, designed t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.12660","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T03:04:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"892f20da52d67a3b44b60c3e88e9f26713c49703155dcb727c1a509b23f00d61","abstract_canon_sha256":"576f1bda7a061f52a9144cfe01da7722872dfa7f3868443991480b6352afde27"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770442Z","signature_b64":"krIstCGIjZpiIwyao+r22C2rnyXSjOSNf+mexW2nGN09+juYKfLFSXhlsrXOpZSMfrIbU5aB9o/JwkiNcWoPCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c08469f63fa4f34524cb889c2228816b09bde976a5aef1ee3151c6eb96aad827","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.769958Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.769958Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable Scientific Analogies after Structure Abduction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Deqing Yang, Jiangjie Chen, Siyu Yuan, Xuyang Ge, Yanghua Xiao","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T03:04:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"The vital role of analogical reasoning in human cognition allows us to grasp novel concepts by linking them with familiar ones through shared relational structures. Despite the attention previous research has given to word analogies, this work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook the structures that underpin these analogies, raising questions about the efficacy of word analogies as a measure of analogical reasoning skills akin to human cognition. In response to this, our paper introduces a task of analogical structure abduction, grounded in cognitive psychology, designed t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.12660","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.12660/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.12660","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.12660v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.12660","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YCCGT5R7UTZU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGL","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YCCGT5R7","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01359","citing_title":"Structural Ranking of the Cognitive Plausibility of Computational Models of Analogy and Metaphors with the Minimal Cognitive Grid","ref_index":275,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YCCGT5R7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YCCGT5R7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.12660&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YCCGT5R7UTZUKJGLRCOCEKEBNM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:56.770022+00:00"}