{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24","short_pith_number":"pith:YCU7BQOL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c0a9f0c1cb09f84fb0bd583f9c59e7d737eaa91258e3ebbac792e3adf1205015","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.01680","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Penrose's 1965 singularity theorem: From geodesic incompleteness to cosmic censorship","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Klaas Landsman","submitted_at":"2022-05-03T10:31:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Supplementing earlier literature by e.g. Tipler, Clarke, & Ellis (1980), Israel (1987), Thorne, (1994), Earman (1999), Senovilla & Garfinkle (2015), Curiel (2019ab), and Landsman (2021ab), I provide a historical and conceptual analysis of Penrose's path-breaking 1965 singularity (or incompleteness) theorem. The emphasis is on the nature and historical origin of the assumptions and definitions used in-or otherwise relevant to-the theorem, as well as on the discrepancy between the (astro)physical goals of the theorem and its actual content: even if its assumptions are met, the theorem fails to p"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.01680","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2022-05-03T10:31:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","math-ph","math.MP"],"title_canon_sha256":"3590f9b93b186ebd1001ddaee9e7813e6ac453918e5eeb7483b8488b73c65af4","abstract_canon_sha256":"9ff286d4b015cda5b137d65fafe37b8f08151c0e783b2116b68640decb9ea0a7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348943Z","signature_b64":"hCIw1mJoaHjjf7A+jNUf5K482KSSY3RuM17Wq6cYy/nXAmkIjSwz+/uIv15HJJZmhOmaQR4Go+z3l2Sr06uGAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c0a9f0c1cb09f84fb0bd583f9c59e7d737eaa91258e3ebbac792e3adf1205015","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348478Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348478Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Penrose's 1965 singularity theorem: From geodesic incompleteness to cosmic censorship","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Klaas Landsman","submitted_at":"2022-05-03T10:31:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Supplementing earlier literature by e.g. Tipler, Clarke, & Ellis (1980), Israel (1987), Thorne, (1994), Earman (1999), Senovilla & Garfinkle (2015), Curiel (2019ab), and Landsman (2021ab), I provide a historical and conceptual analysis of Penrose's path-breaking 1965 singularity (or incompleteness) theorem. The emphasis is on the nature and historical origin of the assumptions and definitions used in-or otherwise relevant to-the theorem, as well as on the discrepancy between the (astro)physical goals of the theorem and its actual content: even if its assumptions are met, the theorem fails to p"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2205.01680","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2205.01680/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.01680","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.01680v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.01680","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YCU7BQOLBH4E","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YCU7BQOL","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23846","citing_title":"Primordial Black Holes: A Review of Formation and Evolution","ref_index":186,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03584","citing_title":"Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03584","citing_title":"Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YCU7BQOL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YCU7BQOL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.01680&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YCU7BQOLBH4E7MF5LA7ZYWPH24/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:33.348533+00:00"}