{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA","short_pith_number":"pith:YIBIS7VP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c202897eaf3fe5611e8d69a4f64b041839f3fef2b9d157cfc21c76c35d3300b4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.19698","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Adel Bibi, Aleksandar Petrov, Philip H.S. Torr","submitted_at":"2023-10-30T16:19:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context-based fine-tuning methods, including prompting, in-context learning, soft prompting (also known as prompt tuning), and prefix-tuning, have gained popularity due to their ability to often match the performance of full fine-tuning with a fraction of the parameters. Despite their empirical successes, there is little theoretical understanding of how these techniques influence the internal computation of the model and their expressiveness limitations. We show that despite the continuous embedding space being more expressive than the discrete token space, soft-prompting and prefix-tuning are"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.19698","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-10-30T16:19:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"c8e0dcfbd184477ccc0c5f50b888506bb51df6cab91759354b0b92172e31bdd2","abstract_canon_sha256":"0f7e18807124acb9c6d1e8d769d4b95d76ce4d2f5164193ba44859deb0dce6ef"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.569262Z","signature_b64":"l1EuZX/1xAsAXL/q2DpKXfVHX4IrdMMxoN1cVtUz5XY4yTrcxVKpmzWFSisBLAHNin9X/ATPgqXAOitq6khDBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c202897eaf3fe5611e8d69a4f64b041839f3fef2b9d157cfc21c76c35d3300b4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568922Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568922Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Adel Bibi, Aleksandar Petrov, Philip H.S. Torr","submitted_at":"2023-10-30T16:19:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context-based fine-tuning methods, including prompting, in-context learning, soft prompting (also known as prompt tuning), and prefix-tuning, have gained popularity due to their ability to often match the performance of full fine-tuning with a fraction of the parameters. Despite their empirical successes, there is little theoretical understanding of how these techniques influence the internal computation of the model and their expressiveness limitations. We show that despite the continuous embedding space being more expressive than the discrete token space, soft-prompting and prefix-tuning are"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.19698","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.19698/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.19698","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.19698v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.19698","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YIBIS7VPH7SW","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YIBIS7VP","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.22655","citing_title":"Do Fine-Tuned LLMs Understand Vulnerabilities? An Investigation into the Semantic Trap","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.13674","citing_title":"PrefixMemory-Tuning: Modernizing Prefix-Tuning by Decoupling the Prefix from Attention","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13421","citing_title":"Combining pre-trained models via localized model averaging","ref_index":164,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2403.14608","citing_title":"Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey","ref_index":103,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YIBIS7VP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YIBIS7VP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.19698&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YIBIS7VPH7SWCHUNNGSPMSYEDA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:05:51.568977+00:00"}