{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6","short_pith_number":"pith:YLFBPSAB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c2ca17c80189a1819798fd144919a587a237c19fd00298843c1422af4ea6bf68","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.06861","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anna Hedstr\\\"om, Daniel Krakowczyk, Dilyara Bareeva, Franz Motzkus, Leander Weber, Marina M.-C. H\\\"ohne, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Wojciech Samek","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T16:45:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The evaluation of explanation methods is a research topic that has not yet been explored deeply, however, since explainability is supposed to strengthen trust in artificial intelligence, it is necessary to systematically review and compare explanation methods in order to confirm their correctness. Until now, no tool with focus on XAI evaluation exists that exhaustively and speedily allows researchers to evaluate the performance of explanations of neural network predictions. To increase transparency and reproducibility in the field, we therefore built Quantus -- a comprehensive, evaluation tool"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.06861","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T16:45:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"88ebc57b937653b821211455d56c736f4abc208c5c4504c4d0e64bbac2239253","abstract_canon_sha256":"0206c5056006bd4ec07cf2a68671b443336876d9f52ce72fd7f7d28d9de72866"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478694Z","signature_b64":"5J3EuYD3vGzFci4CumD1QvfxR8S89uToTx1vcswkg8N4VTCu1W/cjt4kSeKLQFAVSduiWzUCY7eJRVFKbePiDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c2ca17c80189a1819798fd144919a587a237c19fd00298843c1422af4ea6bf68","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478257Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478257Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anna Hedstr\\\"om, Daniel Krakowczyk, Dilyara Bareeva, Franz Motzkus, Leander Weber, Marina M.-C. H\\\"ohne, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Wojciech Samek","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T16:45:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"The evaluation of explanation methods is a research topic that has not yet been explored deeply, however, since explainability is supposed to strengthen trust in artificial intelligence, it is necessary to systematically review and compare explanation methods in order to confirm their correctness. Until now, no tool with focus on XAI evaluation exists that exhaustively and speedily allows researchers to evaluate the performance of explanations of neural network predictions. To increase transparency and reproducibility in the field, we therefore built Quantus -- a comprehensive, evaluation tool"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.06861","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.06861/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.06861","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.06861v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.06861","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YLFBPSABRGQY","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YLFBPSAB","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.03014","citing_title":"xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YLFBPSAB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YLFBPSAB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.06861&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YLFBPSABRGQYDF4Y7UKESGNFQ6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:04:49.478325+00:00"}