{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2","short_pith_number":"pith:YMW6Q5KQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c32de8755038e17dae986fe6777939be9f03ee57fcf36f82af8e0566bad6188c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.14760","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An LLM Feature-based Framework for Dialogue Constructiveness Assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Lexin Zhou, Youmna Farag","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T22:10:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Research on dialogue constructiveness assessment focuses on (i) analysing conversational factors that influence individuals to take specific actions, win debates, change their perspectives or broaden their open-mindedness and (ii) predicting constructiveness outcomes following dialogues for such use cases. These objectives can be achieved by training either interpretable feature-based models (which often involve costly human annotations) or neural models such as pre-trained language models (which have empirically shown higher task accuracy but lack interpretability). In this paper we propose a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.14760","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T22:10:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"b939b848b47e57448aa142c98d2e36373cc448243213c3939dc042392caa2f03","abstract_canon_sha256":"4613d740875dc4a1071159cc07cb44eb2ef66f66771999191fd0cc32a69c7c2f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.824374Z","signature_b64":"ZgwW4ivcVV2SdPQGRA1PXkiFkbU9J5gUnZILS3cUVoWo2+ieGhCX/JE+U9p5nusozbZZZLVZH7cH3FZaop4OBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c32de8755038e17dae986fe6777939be9f03ee57fcf36f82af8e0566bad6188c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823897Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823897Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An LLM Feature-based Framework for Dialogue Constructiveness Assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Lexin Zhou, Youmna Farag","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T22:10:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Research on dialogue constructiveness assessment focuses on (i) analysing conversational factors that influence individuals to take specific actions, win debates, change their perspectives or broaden their open-mindedness and (ii) predicting constructiveness outcomes following dialogues for such use cases. These objectives can be achieved by training either interpretable feature-based models (which often involve costly human annotations) or neural models such as pre-trained language models (which have empirically shown higher task accuracy but lack interpretability). In this paper we propose a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.14760","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.14760/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.14760","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.14760v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.14760","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YMW6Q5KQHDQX","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YMW6Q5KQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.15521","citing_title":"From Divergence to Consensus: Evaluating the Role of Large Language Models in Facilitating Agreement through Adaptive Strategies","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YMW6Q5KQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YMW6Q5KQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.14760&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YMW6Q5KQHDQX3LUYN7THO6JZX2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:34.823960+00:00"}