{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22","short_pith_number":"pith:YOBWPMKF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c38367b1450a41c0d694cc7b67e538d6bdbb1c366d764816c6593eb09d37b9a3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.07053","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Robots in the Middle: Evaluating LLMs in Dispute Resolution","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Hannes Westermann, Jarom\\'ir \\v{S}avelka, Jinzhe Tan, Karim Benyekhlef, Mia Godet, Nikhil Reddy Pottanigari, S\\'ebastien Mee\\`us","submitted_at":"2024-10-09T16:51:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mediation is a dispute resolution method featuring a neutral third-party (mediator) who intervenes to help the individuals resolve their dispute. In this paper, we investigate to which extent large language models (LLMs) are able to act as mediators. We investigate whether LLMs are able to analyze dispute conversations, select suitable intervention types, and generate appropriate intervention messages. Using a novel, manually created dataset of 50 dispute scenarios, we conduct a blind evaluation comparing LLMs with human annotators across several key metrics. Overall, the LLMs showed strong pe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.07053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-10-09T16:51:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"f12280d8e9a74d03d4c52183cf1db1c9a95663f19e2dada837261d2fce7ce784","abstract_canon_sha256":"804655f6819646eaf708e79be61349c9e46b9b25949617ff182a8823c45eb59b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.309216Z","signature_b64":"Npw0apyKr+IRAKKnxzcAfx/lZQvVVHEBo50IUNq0UDjGOWhA+730MXSj5pfre6OssQWkPPY+zjhCjsyjgWTSBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c38367b1450a41c0d694cc7b67e538d6bdbb1c366d764816c6593eb09d37b9a3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308758Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308758Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Robots in the Middle: Evaluating LLMs in Dispute Resolution","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Hannes Westermann, Jarom\\'ir \\v{S}avelka, Jinzhe Tan, Karim Benyekhlef, Mia Godet, Nikhil Reddy Pottanigari, S\\'ebastien Mee\\`us","submitted_at":"2024-10-09T16:51:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mediation is a dispute resolution method featuring a neutral third-party (mediator) who intervenes to help the individuals resolve their dispute. In this paper, we investigate to which extent large language models (LLMs) are able to act as mediators. We investigate whether LLMs are able to analyze dispute conversations, select suitable intervention types, and generate appropriate intervention messages. Using a novel, manually created dataset of 50 dispute scenarios, we conduct a blind evaluation comparing LLMs with human annotators across several key metrics. Overall, the LLMs showed strong pe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.07053","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.07053/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.07053","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.07053v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.07053","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YOBWPMKFBJA4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUU","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YOBWPMKF","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05563","citing_title":"SoCRATES: Towards Reliable Automated Evaluation of Proactive LLM Mediation across Domains and Socio-cognitive Variations","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07613","citing_title":"Can You Trust What You See? Human and AI Detection of Synthetic Legal Evidence","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14097","citing_title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14097","citing_title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YOBWPMKF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YOBWPMKF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.07053&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YOBWPMKFBJA4BVUUZR5WPZJY22/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:10.308815+00:00"}