{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7","short_pith_number":"pith:YORJ6NG3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c3a29f34db6a88428db05a3daaed14c7f85b1f45f86609b6534cfdc1c0dd5c03","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.12857","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chengcheng Han, Chenghua Gong, Jianxiang Yu, Jiaqi Tan, Kangyang Luo, Long Zeng, Qiushi Sun, Renjing Cui, Xiang Li, Yunshi Lan, Zhenmin Weng, Zhiyong Wu, Zichen Ding","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T15:06:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, the rapid increase in scientific papers has overwhelmed traditional review mechanisms, resulting in varying quality of publications. Although existing methods have explored the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated scientific reviewing, their generated contents are often generic or partial. To address the issues above, we introduce an automated paper reviewing framework SEA. It comprises of three modules: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis, which are represented by models SEA-S, SEA-E, and SEA-A, respectively. Initially, SEA-S distills data standard"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.12857","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T15:06:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DL","cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"ca3033d39dd3f972ab39e8f15e9759a4dfee5deb4f7835129b2c0ee694a2bc13","abstract_canon_sha256":"9d60b17e4acf85200fc16d614f549a8afe80ef7b1e6994d2aa89ffb8079f2c3f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.850160Z","signature_b64":"Dr/q+et/LqF+RPyPOlpKAGjTvUViB155eUnU6rguQc+8OVKappNWVaE84JftB0E9ZNgRmSQ/+K+GEq1Lg7naAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c3a29f34db6a88428db05a3daaed14c7f85b1f45f86609b6534cfdc1c0dd5c03","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849702Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849702Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chengcheng Han, Chenghua Gong, Jianxiang Yu, Jiaqi Tan, Kangyang Luo, Long Zeng, Qiushi Sun, Renjing Cui, Xiang Li, Yunshi Lan, Zhenmin Weng, Zhiyong Wu, Zichen Ding","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T15:06:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, the rapid increase in scientific papers has overwhelmed traditional review mechanisms, resulting in varying quality of publications. Although existing methods have explored the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated scientific reviewing, their generated contents are often generic or partial. To address the issues above, we introduce an automated paper reviewing framework SEA. It comprises of three modules: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis, which are represented by models SEA-S, SEA-E, and SEA-A, respectively. Initially, SEA-S distills data standard"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.12857","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.12857/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.12857","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.12857v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.12857","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YORJ6NG3NKEE","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YORJ6NG3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25057","citing_title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","ref_index":66,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31651","citing_title":"FARS: A Fully Automated Research System Deployed at Scale","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.24711","citing_title":"MEIC-DT: Memory-Efficient Incremental Clustering for Long-Text Coreference Resolution with Dual-Threshold Constraints","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26506","citing_title":"SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19502","citing_title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YORJ6NG3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YORJ6NG3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.12857&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YORJ6NG3NKEEFDNQLI62V3IUY7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:21.849764+00:00"}