{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW","short_pith_number":"pith:YP426K36","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c3f9af2b7efe08869dea86ca42e3952db7634aa7e9020e6fdb542fd005c4db30","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.08042","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How to choose master integrals","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.V. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T07:59:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"The standard procedure when evaluating integrals of a given family of Feynman integrals, corresponding to some Feynman graph, is to construct an algorithm which provides the possibility to write any particular integral as a linear combination of so-called master integrals. To do this, public (AIR, FIRE, REDUZE, LiteRed, KIRA) and private codes based on solving integration by parts relations are used. However, the choice of the master integrals provided by these codes is not always optimal. We present an algorithm to improve a given basis of the master integrals, as well as its computer impleme"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.08042","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T07:59:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"241d50ffb389a69c4b7ff3988df7c301fc1b7d0edcec62897a7f92e3d4d82e04","abstract_canon_sha256":"a985705c84d88ae730636211b139d52c9351b4bf65f49cccde57609a22c1c5f2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.399144Z","signature_b64":"doj2LhGHtg+zfdXqQHTqYaf2RLFgJfI5UwVLXx8wlmM4ROgF8GJUzrUk3TiirgyNTkZ6q3MWtTIeWA3HEXPbDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c3f9af2b7efe08869dea86ca42e3952db7634aa7e9020e6fdb542fd005c4db30","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398729Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398729Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How to choose master integrals","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.V. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T07:59:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"The standard procedure when evaluating integrals of a given family of Feynman integrals, corresponding to some Feynman graph, is to construct an algorithm which provides the possibility to write any particular integral as a linear combination of so-called master integrals. To do this, public (AIR, FIRE, REDUZE, LiteRed, KIRA) and private codes based on solving integration by parts relations are used. However, the choice of the master integrals provided by these codes is not always optimal. We present an algorithm to improve a given basis of the master integrals, as well as its computer impleme"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.08042","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.08042/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.08042","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.08042v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.08042","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YP426K367YEI","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YP426K367YEINHPK","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YP426K36","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.08477","citing_title":"AMFlow 2.0: significant algorithmic and software improvements for Feynman integral evaluation","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22500","citing_title":"Taming Symbolic IBP Reduction with Intermediate Bases","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00187","citing_title":"From geometry to phenomenology","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2008.06494","citing_title":"Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods","ref_index":63,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.15751","citing_title":"The photon-energy spectrum in $B\\to X_s\\gamma$ to N$^3$LO: light-fermion and large-$N_{\\rm c}$ corrections","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09534","citing_title":"The four-loop non-singlet splitting functions in QCD","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YP426K36"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YP426K36","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.08042&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YP426K367YEINHPKQ3FEFY4VFW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:16:43.398785+00:00"}