{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U","short_pith_number":"pith:YP42EEGN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c3f9a210cd38259fd7f9ee51350867ed1aee90d07ccc7efdb26f0d3f7903eaf2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.05555","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Using Large Language Models to Simulate Human Behavioural Experiments: Port of Mars","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Joel Z. Leibo, Marco A. Janssen, Oliver Slumbers","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T20:02:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Collective risk social dilemmas (CRSD) highlight a trade-off between individual preferences and the need for all to contribute toward achieving a group objective. Problems such as climate change are in this category, and so it is critical to understand their social underpinnings. However, rigorous CRSD methodology often demands large-scale human experiments but it is difficult to guarantee sufficient power and heterogeneity over socio-demographic factors. Generative AI offers a potential complementary approach to address thisproblem. By replacing human participants with large language models ("},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.05555","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T20:02:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"0f03049521d92df75a0f7c6b170a5834bcc2a79086b7c51de266574e5776e08d","abstract_canon_sha256":"6b9bc00ed711a5c338fd5b4e3df7db5ec6a66ee54ecefad8ee8b57cfb9874dbc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663519Z","signature_b64":"ifuznkWvfM/8/U4YBZVHOzdCqSzbLPUHL+Ip2V7K44iTI8Gm3m6AX+nPtiRmJqyPqAvzC1X6qcDuxc+eBbSBBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c3f9a210cd38259fd7f9ee51350867ed1aee90d07ccc7efdb26f0d3f7903eaf2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.662975Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.662975Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Using Large Language Models to Simulate Human Behavioural Experiments: Port of Mars","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Joel Z. Leibo, Marco A. Janssen, Oliver Slumbers","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T20:02:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"Collective risk social dilemmas (CRSD) highlight a trade-off between individual preferences and the need for all to contribute toward achieving a group objective. Problems such as climate change are in this category, and so it is critical to understand their social underpinnings. However, rigorous CRSD methodology often demands large-scale human experiments but it is difficult to guarantee sufficient power and heterogeneity over socio-demographic factors. Generative AI offers a potential complementary approach to address thisproblem. By replacing human participants with large language models ("},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.05555","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.05555/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.05555","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.05555v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.05555","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YP42EEGNHASZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YP42EEGN","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17079","citing_title":"Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBench","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11721","citing_title":"Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YP42EEGN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YP42EEGN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.05555&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YP42EEGNHASZ7V7Z5ZITKCDH5U/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:17:05.663041+00:00"}