{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE","short_pith_number":"pith:YPIVCVJS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c3d15155322d5dbb8ee09bd907ed56a12f96c807d2d47cd9fc1ba7af88fe1b9e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.03014","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.ET"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chintan Chitroda, Neeraj Kumar Singh, Pratinav Seth, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu, Yashwardhan Rathore","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T09:17:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"The growing complexity of machine learning and deep learning models has led to an increased reliance on opaque \"black box\" systems, making it difficult to understand the rationale behind predictions. This lack of transparency is particularly challenging in high-stakes applications where interpretability is as important as accuracy. Post-hoc explanation methods are commonly used to interpret these models, but they are seldom rigorously evaluated, raising concerns about their reliability. The Python package xai_evals addresses this by providing a comprehensive framework for generating, benchmark"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.03014","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T09:17:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.ET"],"title_canon_sha256":"1385d6b823f2e67e5140585b37ff4bc9025dc5835c93b3bd8d7a9e3458f3fefb","abstract_canon_sha256":"247f34fbda3e94dbf752854554c4ee00ec25c5b02fcecb3e36c0eaa3eb17b433"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295781Z","signature_b64":"FQ+vI8XZTHuBFxy79P4I6w3qIGOyeva0QEsOTqjw4a5BoEiNnCbs1vP+0/U/rG4d81t0W3g90SfCDfLrioV0CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c3d15155322d5dbb8ee09bd907ed56a12f96c807d2d47cd9fc1ba7af88fe1b9e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295004Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295004Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.ET"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chintan Chitroda, Neeraj Kumar Singh, Pratinav Seth, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu, Yashwardhan Rathore","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T09:17:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"The growing complexity of machine learning and deep learning models has led to an increased reliance on opaque \"black box\" systems, making it difficult to understand the rationale behind predictions. This lack of transparency is particularly challenging in high-stakes applications where interpretability is as important as accuracy. Post-hoc explanation methods are commonly used to interpret these models, but they are seldom rigorously evaluated, raising concerns about their reliability. The Python package xai_evals addresses this by providing a comprehensive framework for generating, benchmark"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.03014","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.03014/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.03014","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.03014v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.03014","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"YPIVCVJSFVO3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXA","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"YPIVCVJS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05355","citing_title":"Faithfulness to Refusal: A Causal Audit of Neuron Selectors","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YPIVCVJS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/YPIVCVJS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.03014&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/YPIVCVJSFVO3XDXATPMQP3KWUE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:09:58.295071+00:00"}